i hate posting anything negative about Chuck because whenever i do crybabies like to negative rep me even when i have VALID arguments against Chuck in certain respects.
Ive said it a thousand times and i`ll say it again though i think that chucks record is over-inflated. You guys give all these names the Chuck fought and you say that hes amazing but you fail to remember "how did the fighter look that fight" and "was the fighter in a slump at the time or were they at the top of their game"
guys like couture, ortiz, belfort were all beaten because at the time they werent near the top of the class, other guys like randelman have a 50-50win ratio so whats to boast about?
at the risk of these losers negative repping me again i`ll just put that out as AT LEAST A THOUGHT. just think about it thats all i ask, im not saying that Chucks record is worth shit its worth a lot but if you factor in Pride at the same TIME as his fights when he was winning a Pride had the better fighters so Chuck was never properly tested when he was at the top of his game.
MAYBE he can come back, who knows Randy did it and he came back hard so maybe Chuck can as well.
Its not right to disrespect Chuck but at the same time dont make him into something hes not, he was never truely #1.