PHOTO OF THE DAY

SIGNIN 

 

Register Now

Not a member yet? Join today - its free!



UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on Spike TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply

Old 10-06-2007, 07:27 PM   #81 (permalink)
PanKrato
Bantamweight
 
PanKrato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rockers Ville
Posts: 591
PanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shamrock-Ortiz
This could mean that Sherk vs. Penn is back on the cards??
O M F G!!!
WOOOOO!!!! I thought Sherk was clean! Sweeeeet, maybe what happened was some A-hole slipped some roids on Sherk somehow, or put it in his supplements to try and screw him over.

Hope BJ V Sherk goes down!
__________________
Religious Version:
"Faith without Works is Dead."

Academic Version:
"Knowledge without Action is Dead."

MMA Version:
"Skill without Application is Death."
PanKrato is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 10-06-2007, 07:34 PM   #82 (permalink)
Lachk
Amatuer
 
Lachk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wirral, UK
Posts: 136
Lachk will become famous soon enoughLachk will become famous soon enoughLachk will become famous soon enoughLachk will become famous soon enoughLachk will become famous soon enoughLachk will become famous soon enoughLachk will become famous soon enoughLachk will become famous soon enoughLachk will become famous soon enoughLachk will become famous soon enoughLachk will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasvll
This isn't a legal case.
Much later in the same discussion......

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasvll
As for your hypothetical about cheating coaches, commission rulings are on a case by case basis. They don't set legal precedents. Whatever they decide in Sherk's case, they can decide the opposite in the next case.
Surely you haven't contradicted yourself in the same arguement? Why have you said "legal precedent" if it's not a legal case? Maybe you understand that the term legal does not just pertain to governmental law as you hinted towards earlier in this discussion.

Hmmmm, perhaps there are chinks in the flawless facade of your arguements after all.

P.S. Live by the sword, die by the sword. Sorry couldn't resist, trolling may actually be addictive.....
Lachk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 07:39 PM   #83 (permalink)
thai_fighter
Amatuer
 
thai_fighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 170
thai_fighter has a little shameless behaviour in the past
if he did take or not take roids that is something that only he knows. if it ever turns out that he did and could hide it that good, i would ban him from ever fighting in the ufc again.
__________________
<a href= http://www.mybannermaker.com target= _blank ><img src= http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/4...32dc5ecga5.jpg alt='Create your own banner at mybannermaker.com ' border=0 /></a><br>
thai_fighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 08:04 PM   #84 (permalink)
jasvll
Heavyweight
 
jasvll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,765
Blog Entries: 13
jasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lachk
Surely you haven't contradicted yourself in the same arguement? Why have you said "legal precedent" if it's not a legal case? Maybe you understand that the term legal does not just pertain to governmental law as you hinted towards earlier in this discussion.
If I had said that they do set legal precedents, you'd have a point. As it is, you've simply pointed out where I've repeated the same point in a separate discussion.

Quote:
Hmmmm, perhaps there are chinks in the flawless facade of your arguements after all.
Either that or you've simply shown that you're unhealthy obsession with me continues.

And by the way, if I do turn out to be wrong about something, it won't be the first time.

Quote:
P.S. Live by the sword, die by the sword. Sorry couldn't resist, trolling may actually be addictive.....
Mods, we have two self-admitted trolls on this thread. Let's try to crack down on that. The cynics win either way.


On a general note, I wonder what those that find lie detector tests useless would be saying had Sherk failed? I'm guessing it would be similar to steroid testing. If you come back clean, it means you timed your cycle right. If you come back dirty, you didn't.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Rogan
That longing to return to the retarded past can only be born of some collective, subconscious, internal desire to try to turn back the clock on humanity and halt our obvious progression towards the inevitable zombie apocalypse of 2012.

Last edited by jasvll : 10-06-2007 at 09:00 PM.
jasvll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 02:41 AM   #85 (permalink)
Nobilis
Amatuer
 
Nobilis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 194
Nobilis has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasvll
This isn't a legal case.
Doesn't make a lie detector test anymore reliable. Lie detectors only have a 70% success rate. Supposedly, there are others who say less and others that say more. I think that in itself just proves the unreliability. Way too many variables. It proves nothing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasvll
Not even if you were using them to prove that they were useless at detecting lies?
And one of these 3 doors leads to a pride of lions...choose carefully.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wise
Well I mean you have to take a polygraph to get a clearance for most goverment jobs and alot of high end positions in companies so obviously people put alot of stock into what the results of the test is. Also the new computerized ones are apparently close to almost 100% accurate if they gave him one of those. Generally the error in them comes from the guy actually giving the test rather than the machine. This still doesnt mean someone didnt give something to Sherk that might have been some steroids, to me this pretty much proves that he didnt take any or hes dumb and maybe should have done more research on what he was putting into his body.
Wholly shit...remind me to never have you on any jury that I might be involved in. That has got to be one of the most naive statements I've heard in awhile. Kind of ironic considering your handle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lachk
I'm sure you'll try and drag this out for a while, so have fun.
You sure you ain't psychic?

Sorry but to me anyway...just being accused sets doubt in peoples minds...even if you are proven innocent. It is like being accused of being a pedophile, it becomes irrelevant after you have been cleared...the doubt lives on in many people and your life is forever changed.

Nobody has proven Barry Bonds took steroids but it hasn't stopped him being condemned by the fans. Jone's recent admission of guilt has now made it more difficult for other athletes that get accused. If Jones will lie....
__________________
MY FIVE

1. George St. Pierre
2. Anderson Silva
3. Fedor Emelianenko
4. Don Frye
5. Kenny Florian

Last edited by Nobilis : 10-07-2007 at 02:44 AM.
Nobilis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 02:42 AM   #86 (permalink)
wukkadb
Das Übermensch
 
wukkadb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 7,485
wukkadb is on another level nowwukkadb is on another level nowwukkadb is on another level nowwukkadb is on another level nowwukkadb is on another level nowwukkadb is on another level nowwukkadb is on another level nowwukkadb is on another level nowwukkadb is on another level nowwukkadb is on another level nowwukkadb is on another level now
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickman9000
I think he starts roiding right after he got his ass kicked by GSP. Or he could have just been rioding in his Pride days, and it hadn't yet worked it's way out of his system. Who knows.
Sherk only had one fight in Pride
__________________
wukkadb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 06:14 AM   #87 (permalink)
N1™
_ THE DRAGON_
 
N1™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bangbus
Posts: 4,712
N1™ Lord of The ForumN1™ Lord of The ForumN1™ Lord of The ForumN1™ Lord of The ForumN1™ Lord of The ForumN1™ Lord of The ForumN1™ Lord of The ForumN1™ Lord of The ForumN1™ Lord of The ForumN1™ Lord of The ForumN1™ Lord of The Forum
if you have enough time you can learn to trick the machine... but who knows
__________________
N1™ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 10:26 AM   #88 (permalink)
jasvll
Heavyweight
 
jasvll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,765
Blog Entries: 13
jasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to alljasvll is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nobilis
Doesn't make a lie detector test anymore reliable. Lie detectors only have a 70% success rate. Supposedly, there are others who say less and others that say more. I think that in itself just proves the unreliability. Way too many variables. It proves nothing.
The point was that there is a much different standard being held to by the commission (popular opinion) than in a criminal case (proof of guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt). If the lie detector test helps convince the commission that Sherk didn't knowingly take steroids, then it helps his case. Whether or not the test is 100% reliable wouldn't matter to him in that scenario, would it?

As for reliable tests, the nandrolone metabolite test Sherk failed is far from incontrovertible. It tests for naturally occurring substances (something scientists discovered about a decade after the test was put in place). Those natuarlly occurring substances can be elevated by causes other than taking the banned substance. The test doesn't even detect the substance it finds the subject guilty of taking.

If that test can get your license suspended and your title taken away, I see no reason why a similarly controversial test shouldn't help you to keep it.

For the record, I hate watching Sherk fight.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Rogan
That longing to return to the retarded past can only be born of some collective, subconscious, internal desire to try to turn back the clock on humanity and halt our obvious progression towards the inevitable zombie apocalypse of 2012.

Last edited by jasvll : 10-07-2007 at 10:29 AM.
jasvll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 10:36 AM   #89 (permalink)
PanKrato
Bantamweight
 
PanKrato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rockers Ville
Posts: 591
PanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to beholdPanKrato is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasvll
The point was that there is a much different standard being held to by the commission (popular opinion) than in a criminal case (proof of guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt). If the lie detector test helps convince the commission that Sherk didn't knowingly take steroids, then it helps his case. Whether or not the test is 100% reliable wouldn't matter to him in that scenario, would it?

As for reliable tests, the nandrolone metabolite test Sherk failed is far from incontrovertible. It tests for naturally occurring substances (something scientists discovered about a decade after the test was put in place). Those natuarlly occurring substances can be elevated by causes other than taking the banned substance. The test doesn't even detect the substance it finds the subject guilty of taking.

If that test can get your license suspended and your title taken away, I see no reason why a similarly controversial test shouldn't help you to keep it.

For the record, I hate watching Sherk fight.
wow. i didn't know that about the nandrolone thingy test... that's good to know.
__________________
Religious Version:
"Faith without Works is Dead."

Academic Version:
"Knowledge without Action is Dead."

MMA Version:
"Skill without Application is Death."
PanKrato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 07:50 AM   #90 (permalink)
slapshot
Lightweight
 
slapshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,594
slapshot is a jewel in the roughslapshot is a jewel in the roughslapshot is a jewel in the roughslapshot is a jewel in the roughslapshot is a jewel in the roughslapshot is a jewel in the roughslapshot is a jewel in the roughslapshot is a jewel in the roughslapshot is a jewel in the roughslapshot is a jewel in the roughslapshot is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreg
Not 100% accurate but it can't hurt going into his appeal.
Hmm Im willing to bet the testing they used for the steroids is much less acurate.
__________________
There was a fire and a blonde called the fire dept. The Fire Department asked how to get to her house. She replied, "DUH! In a Big Red Truck!"
slapshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios