MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos

MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos (http://www.mmaforum.com/)
-   UFC (http://www.mmaforum.com/ufc/)
-   -   UFC 63 - PPV of the Year... (http://www.mmaforum.com/ufc/2867-ufc-63-ppv-year.html)

Alex_DeLarge 09-24-2006 01:25 AM

UFC 63 - PPV of the Year...
 
Until 64 of course.

But this was a really good PPV...

Jens defeated was the upset of the night.

Rashad finished a fight, and respectfully.

Loiseau and Swick could have been better, if the Crow was more aggressive he probably would have won but that's the way it goes.

Tyson had a pretty good submission and looked impressive.

A BODY PUNCH knockout...that was insane, and an exciting fight, I thought Gabe might have had it late in the first, great fight.

Penn/Hughes, awesome fight, back and forth action and Hughes, and please dont take this offensive but...**** you BJ Penn nuthuggers. I'm a fan myself, a fan of both of these guys, but no excuses made, "He would have won if he did this, if he did that", or the "stoppage was too quick".

Be honest with yourself, if Liddell was in the EXACT situation Hughes was in, we'd call it a "dominant" performance, but if he defeats a well respectable fighter like BJ Penn, then it's a "fluke"..

MMA freak 09-24-2006 01:30 AM

No way, UFC 66 will be the best. Two major title shots on the line. Plus other matches to be named that will probably be decent. Plus UFC 58 and 59 were better than UFC 63. But I have to admit 63 was better than 60, 61, and 62.

asskicker 09-24-2006 01:30 AM

I think this was definatly the best PPV Ive seen this year. Ive only seen 59 and on tho. I was very happy with it tho. And I thought Rashad looked great.

ROCKBASS03 09-24-2006 01:33 AM

Wow MMA Freak, another impressive, yet ignorant post:laugh:



I thought pretty much the whole card was good. Even the undercard fights were pretty good.

Alex_DeLarge 09-24-2006 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMA freak
No way, UFC 66 will be the best. Two major title shots on the line. Plus other matches to be named that will probably be decent. Plus UFC 58 and 59 were better than UFC 63. But I have to admit 63 was better than 60, 61, and 62.

58 was close, but I thought 63 was better. And I must say 59 wasnt too impressive to me, I think 63 completely over done that one.

UFC 66 better than 63 or 64? I find that highly unlikely too, anytime you have Tito headlining against Chuck Liddell...expect a quick fight. Tito hasent done **** to earn a title shot and it'll be another overhyped fight..(Shamrock/Ortiz like, only this time Chuck takes Titos place). GSP/Hughes should be a pretty good one...but I still think 64 looks better.

asskicker 09-24-2006 01:47 AM

Tito definatly deserves a title shot. He was the longest reigning champ in UFC history and only has one loss since losnig that and that was to Chuck and he hasnt lost since. He hasnt gotten a title shot since he lost his belt so you tell me whose more deserving for a shot at the title right now.

Alex_DeLarge 09-24-2006 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by asskicker
Tito definatly deserves a title shot. He was the longest reigning champ in UFC history and only has one loss since losnig that and that was to Chuck and he hasnt lost since. He hasnt gotten a title shot since he lost his belt so you tell me whose more deserving for a shot at the title right now.


The past when he had the belt should not dictate whether you deserve a title shot or not.

Tito definitely deserves it after what? Barely edging out an average fighter like Forrest Griffin (Whom in many peoples minds thought he won that), and pounded on poor Shamrock again. Beat an over the hill Belfort and a unanimous decision over Cote who took it to him...not that impressive my man.

And to be quite honest with you, I still think Babalu could take out Ortiz.

Now note I said "he doesnt deserve it"...I didnt say "theres others they can put Chuck against"..when there's not.

Babalu came off a bad loss to Liddell so he'll be out of the picture.
It wouldnt make sense to have Forrest fight Liddell because Tito beat him (questionably of course). Jardine has looked pretty good recently so that might be one canditate. Evans finally finished a fight against a real skilled fighter so he could be more deserving.

And there's one more guy that is going to rise up the charts immediately, and believe me when I say this, his name is Michael Bisping.

MMA freak 09-24-2006 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROCKBASS03
Wow MMA Freak, another impressive, yet ignorant post:laugh:

What do you have against me? Seriously every post I make you try every attempt to prove me wrong. UFC 58 and 59 were better than 63 and so will 64 and 66. I didn't say 63 sucked, infact it was great. Its just the four I mentioned were and will be better.

AxL 09-24-2006 01:57 AM

best ppv since 53. every fight was a fun one and we even had a submission which is rare in the days of overexposed tuf guys who look for knockouts. i had a great time watchin this one.

ROCKBASS03 09-24-2006 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMA freak
What do you have against me? Seriously every post I make you try every attempt to prove me wrong. UFC 58 and 59 were better than 63 and so will 64 and 66. I didn't say 63 sucked, infact it was great. Its just the four I mentioned were and will be better.

All opinions. So in your eyes, they might be or will be better, doesn't mean that overall they are.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.8 , Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2