UFC 63 - PPV of the Year... - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 22 (permalink) Old 09-24-2006, 02:25 AM Thread Starter
Super Heavyweight
 
Alex_DeLarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,223
                     
UFC 63 - PPV of the Year...

Until 64 of course.

But this was a really good PPV...

Jens defeated was the upset of the night.

Rashad finished a fight, and respectfully.

Loiseau and Swick could have been better, if the Crow was more aggressive he probably would have won but that's the way it goes.

Tyson had a pretty good submission and looked impressive.

A BODY PUNCH knockout...that was insane, and an exciting fight, I thought Gabe might have had it late in the first, great fight.

Penn/Hughes, awesome fight, back and forth action and Hughes, and please dont take this offensive but...**** you BJ Penn nuthuggers. I'm a fan myself, a fan of both of these guys, but no excuses made, "He would have won if he did this, if he did that", or the "stoppage was too quick".

Be honest with yourself, if Liddell was in the EXACT situation Hughes was in, we'd call it a "dominant" performance, but if he defeats a well respectable fighter like BJ Penn, then it's a "fluke"..
Alex_DeLarge is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 22 (permalink) Old 09-24-2006, 02:30 AM
Banned
 
MMA freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,901
 
No way, UFC 66 will be the best. Two major title shots on the line. Plus other matches to be named that will probably be decent. Plus UFC 58 and 59 were better than UFC 63. But I have to admit 63 was better than 60, 61, and 62.
MMA freak is offline  
post #3 of 22 (permalink) Old 09-24-2006, 02:30 AM
GO BEARS!
 
asskicker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 3,763
                     
I think this was definatly the best PPV Ive seen this year. Ive only seen 59 and on tho. I was very happy with it tho. And I thought Rashad looked great.

14-1 in Forum Bets
asskicker is offline  
post #4 of 22 (permalink) Old 09-24-2006, 02:33 AM
Users Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 808
                     
Wow MMA Freak, another impressive, yet ignorant post



I thought pretty much the whole card was good. Even the undercard fights were pretty good.
ROCKBASS03 is offline  
post #5 of 22 (permalink) Old 09-24-2006, 02:35 AM Thread Starter
Super Heavyweight
 
Alex_DeLarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,223
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMA freak
No way, UFC 66 will be the best. Two major title shots on the line. Plus other matches to be named that will probably be decent. Plus UFC 58 and 59 were better than UFC 63. But I have to admit 63 was better than 60, 61, and 62.
58 was close, but I thought 63 was better. And I must say 59 wasnt too impressive to me, I think 63 completely over done that one.

UFC 66 better than 63 or 64? I find that highly unlikely too, anytime you have Tito headlining against Chuck Liddell...expect a quick fight. Tito hasent done **** to earn a title shot and it'll be another overhyped fight..(Shamrock/Ortiz like, only this time Chuck takes Titos place). GSP/Hughes should be a pretty good one...but I still think 64 looks better.
Alex_DeLarge is offline  
post #6 of 22 (permalink) Old 09-24-2006, 02:47 AM
GO BEARS!
 
asskicker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 3,763
                     
Tito definatly deserves a title shot. He was the longest reigning champ in UFC history and only has one loss since losnig that and that was to Chuck and he hasnt lost since. He hasnt gotten a title shot since he lost his belt so you tell me whose more deserving for a shot at the title right now.

14-1 in Forum Bets
asskicker is offline  
post #7 of 22 (permalink) Old 09-24-2006, 02:53 AM Thread Starter
Super Heavyweight
 
Alex_DeLarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,223
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by asskicker
Tito definatly deserves a title shot. He was the longest reigning champ in UFC history and only has one loss since losnig that and that was to Chuck and he hasnt lost since. He hasnt gotten a title shot since he lost his belt so you tell me whose more deserving for a shot at the title right now.

The past when he had the belt should not dictate whether you deserve a title shot or not.

Tito definitely deserves it after what? Barely edging out an average fighter like Forrest Griffin (Whom in many peoples minds thought he won that), and pounded on poor Shamrock again. Beat an over the hill Belfort and a unanimous decision over Cote who took it to him...not that impressive my man.

And to be quite honest with you, I still think Babalu could take out Ortiz.

Now note I said "he doesnt deserve it"...I didnt say "theres others they can put Chuck against"..when there's not.

Babalu came off a bad loss to Liddell so he'll be out of the picture.
It wouldnt make sense to have Forrest fight Liddell because Tito beat him (questionably of course). Jardine has looked pretty good recently so that might be one canditate. Evans finally finished a fight against a real skilled fighter so he could be more deserving.

And there's one more guy that is going to rise up the charts immediately, and believe me when I say this, his name is Michael Bisping.
Alex_DeLarge is offline  
post #8 of 22 (permalink) Old 09-24-2006, 02:56 AM
Banned
 
MMA freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,901
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROCKBASS03
Wow MMA Freak, another impressive, yet ignorant post
What do you have against me? Seriously every post I make you try every attempt to prove me wrong. UFC 58 and 59 were better than 63 and so will 64 and 66. I didn't say 63 sucked, infact it was great. Its just the four I mentioned were and will be better.
MMA freak is offline  
post #9 of 22 (permalink) Old 09-24-2006, 02:57 AM
AxL
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: east coast u.s.a
Posts: 61
 
best ppv since 53. every fight was a fun one and we even had a submission which is rare in the days of overexposed tuf guys who look for knockouts. i had a great time watchin this one.

If you don't like what I say then state your case and then shut up about it. Don't B*%&# like an old lady
AxL is offline  
post #10 of 22 (permalink) Old 09-24-2006, 03:01 AM
Users Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 808
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMA freak
What do you have against me? Seriously every post I make you try every attempt to prove me wrong. UFC 58 and 59 were better than 63 and so will 64 and 66. I didn't say 63 sucked, infact it was great. Its just the four I mentioned were and will be better.
All opinions. So in your eyes, they might be or will be better, doesn't mean that overall they are.
ROCKBASS03 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome