Mixed Martial Arts Forum banner

UFC 63 - PPV of the Year...

2K views 21 replies 6 participants last post by  asskicker 
#1 ·
Until 64 of course.

But this was a really good PPV...

Jens defeated was the upset of the night.

Rashad finished a fight, and respectfully.

Loiseau and Swick could have been better, if the Crow was more aggressive he probably would have won but that's the way it goes.

Tyson had a pretty good submission and looked impressive.

A BODY PUNCH knockout...that was insane, and an exciting fight, I thought Gabe might have had it late in the first, great fight.

Penn/Hughes, awesome fight, back and forth action and Hughes, and please dont take this offensive but...**** you BJ Penn nuthuggers. I'm a fan myself, a fan of both of these guys, but no excuses made, "He would have won if he did this, if he did that", or the "stoppage was too quick".

Be honest with yourself, if Liddell was in the EXACT situation Hughes was in, we'd call it a "dominant" performance, but if he defeats a well respectable fighter like BJ Penn, then it's a "fluke"..
 
See less See more
#5 ·
MMA freak said:
No way, UFC 66 will be the best. Two major title shots on the line. Plus other matches to be named that will probably be decent. Plus UFC 58 and 59 were better than UFC 63. But I have to admit 63 was better than 60, 61, and 62.
58 was close, but I thought 63 was better. And I must say 59 wasnt too impressive to me, I think 63 completely over done that one.

UFC 66 better than 63 or 64? I find that highly unlikely too, anytime you have Tito headlining against Chuck Liddell...expect a quick fight. Tito hasent done **** to earn a title shot and it'll be another overhyped fight..(Shamrock/Ortiz like, only this time Chuck takes Titos place). GSP/Hughes should be a pretty good one...but I still think 64 looks better.
 
#6 ·
Tito definatly deserves a title shot. He was the longest reigning champ in UFC history and only has one loss since losnig that and that was to Chuck and he hasnt lost since. He hasnt gotten a title shot since he lost his belt so you tell me whose more deserving for a shot at the title right now.
 
#7 ·
asskicker said:
Tito definatly deserves a title shot. He was the longest reigning champ in UFC history and only has one loss since losnig that and that was to Chuck and he hasnt lost since. He hasnt gotten a title shot since he lost his belt so you tell me whose more deserving for a shot at the title right now.

The past when he had the belt should not dictate whether you deserve a title shot or not.

Tito definitely deserves it after what? Barely edging out an average fighter like Forrest Griffin (Whom in many peoples minds thought he won that), and pounded on poor Shamrock again. Beat an over the hill Belfort and a unanimous decision over Cote who took it to him...not that impressive my man.

And to be quite honest with you, I still think Babalu could take out Ortiz.

Now note I said "he doesnt deserve it"...I didnt say "theres others they can put Chuck against"..when there's not.

Babalu came off a bad loss to Liddell so he'll be out of the picture.
It wouldnt make sense to have Forrest fight Liddell because Tito beat him (questionably of course). Jardine has looked pretty good recently so that might be one canditate. Evans finally finished a fight against a real skilled fighter so he could be more deserving.

And there's one more guy that is going to rise up the charts immediately, and believe me when I say this, his name is Michael Bisping.
 
#9 ·
best ppv since 53. every fight was a fun one and we even had a submission which is rare in the days of overexposed tuf guys who look for knockouts. i had a great time watchin this one.
 
#10 ·
MMA freak said:
What do you have against me? Seriously every post I make you try every attempt to prove me wrong. UFC 58 and 59 were better than 63 and so will 64 and 66. I didn't say 63 sucked, infact it was great. Its just the four I mentioned were and will be better.
All opinions. So in your eyes, they might be or will be better, doesn't mean that overall they are.
 
#11 ·
Ok Alex lets just give Michael Bisping a title shot now cuz he beat Josh Haynes. Are u f***in serious bro? Almost every time a champ loses there title they get a rematch. Now your telling me the guy who was champ the longest shouldnt have one. Now if you cant think of a better name in the 205 division who is more deserving than Tito of the shot other than Bisping Im sorry you are just stupid.
 
#14 ·
asskicker said:
Ok Alex lets just give Michael Bisping a title shot now cuz he beat Josh Haynes. Are u f***in serious bro? Almost every time a champ loses there title they get a rematch. Now your telling me the guy who was champ the longest shouldnt have one. Now if you cant think of a better name in the 205 division who is more deserving than Tito of the shot other than Bisping Im sorry you are just stupid.
No swearing or offensive remarks to other members or you will be warned asskicker. I agree Bisping needs to work his way up like the rest before getting a title shot. There are two others in the light heavyweight division before him that deserve it more. But theres no need to call someone stupid over an opinion.
 
#15 ·
asskicker said:
Ok Alex lets just give Michael Bisping a title shot now cuz he beat Josh Haynes. Are u f***in serious bro? Almost every time a champ loses there title they get a rematch. Now your telling me the guy who was champ the longest shouldnt have one. Now if you cant think of a better name in the 205 division who is more deserving than Tito of the shot other than Bisping Im sorry you are just stupid.
Did I say he was worthy of a title shot? Find me where I said that please. I did not say that, I said he'll climb the ladder to get there.

And I already told you, Evans has certainly earned his spot, Jardine would make a good fight.
 
#17 ·
I under estimated UFC 62, looked like one of the worst cards in UFC history however I enjoyed it. UFC 60 and 61 however I wasn't fond of. They could have been better. I was dissapointed with UFC 60 only having one match I looked forward to and 61 how Arlovski .vs. Silva both just stood there and Shamrock .vs. Ortiz being stopped too early.
 
#18 ·
MMA freak said:
I under estimated UFC 62, looked like one of the worst cards in UFC history however I enjoyed it. UFC 60 and 61 however I wasn't fond of. They could have been better. I was dissapointed with UFC 60 only having one match I looked forward to and 61 how Arlovski .vs. Silva both just stood there and Shamrock .vs. Ortiz being stopped too early.
There's always one way to think positive towards those PPV's...just think UFC 56 :thumbsdown:
 
#19 ·
OMG Jardine and Evans? More deserving than Tito? Ok Alex Im sorry I called you stupid. But come on your obviously a TUF nuthugger who doesnt know a whole lot beyond TUF. I sure hope I wont get warned for these comments MMA freak. I cant believe I cant even say stupid. What are you my kindergarded teacher?
 
#20 ·
asskicker said:
OMG Jardine and Evans? More deserving than Tito? Ok Alex Im sorry I called you stupid. But come on your obviously a TUF nuthugger who doesnt know a whole lot beyond TUF. I sure hope I wont get warned for these comments MMA freak. I cant believe I cant even say stupid. What are you my kindergarded teacher?
No, not stupid, you said the f word twice. Stupid is fine just no f word. You won't get banned, just warned by me or one of the other moderators as foul language gives you 1 warning point on this forum.

I agree Jardine is terrible, he will never get near the light heavyweight title. Rashad Evans has been on a roll and looked impressive today, I wouldn't be surprised if he gets a shot in a years time.
 
#21 ·
asskicker said:
OMG Jardine and Evans? More deserving than Tito? Ok Alex Im sorry I called you stupid. But come on your obviously a TUF nuthugger who doesnt know a whole lot beyond TUF. I sure hope I wont get warned for these comments MMA freak. I cant believe I cant even say stupid. What are you my kindergarded teacher?
A tuf NUTHUGGER? Are you kidding me man? I cant help the dudes were on a show that brought the UFC towards the mainstream population. I sincerely do not appreciate you labeling me by saying "I dont know a lot beyond TUF".

First of all, Evans is on a roll, and is undefeated in his career, and as a UFC fighter. He's beaten good competition in Bonnar and Lambert and has basically mowed through everyone he has faced. Jardine I didnt say was more deserving, I said he could be. I think he's a good fighter, and a fighter I like to watch, I personally think he was jobbed against Bonnar.

But if you want to take this whole conversation offensively and continue to try and bring me down because of my opinions by calling me a "TUF nuthugger" then I'm through with this conversation man.
 
#22 ·
Ok I just dont see how you think Tito doesnt deserve a shot then. Yes i was really impressed with Rashad tonite but hes still not ready IMO hes 3rd in line after Tito and Griffin right now tho I think hed beat Forrest. And MMA freak I didnt say the F word i inserted those stars myself so it could be anything.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top