Quote:
Originally Posted by js9234
If you thought Machida was the aggressor you were obviously watching a different fight than me.
|
There's a difference between being the agressor and being aggressive. Most people associate aggressor with aggressive but they are not the same thing. Machida was definitely NOT aggressive, but he was the aggressor. To be the aggressor, you must be the one to initiate any kind of attack, and while Machida did do some counter attacking, most of his kicks and punches were the initiators. That does indeed make him the aggressor of the fight.
Could Machida have been more aggressive in the fight? Of course
Could he have possibly finished Tito earlier? I would say yes, but that's a tough one to tell
Did he gain a lot of fans? Most likely not
These are all things I acknowledge but the fact still remains that he initiated a lot of attacks.
And this fight wasn't like a lay n pray or a Starnes fiasco since Tito did take a
considerable amount of damage. Look at his face, that huge liver shot, the hammers at the end of round 1, and most of all, his left leg.
And if people don't want to watch him because he's boring...then don't.