|
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books.
UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on Spike TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.
 |
|
08-21-2008, 02:37 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Working Jitz
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England
Posts: 913
|
Telegraph says Liddell should retire if he loses
The article is on the UFC website-
I completely disagree with the statement that Liddell should retire if he loses!!
All fights are unique and there are no guarantees regardless of talent etc, if indeed liddell did lose surely retirement shouldnt be considered?
__________________
Still got love for Liddell 
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 02:39 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
MMA Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mass
Posts: 128
|
i completly agree they are retarded, not to mention he won't loose 
__________________
The Gang
Randy Couture
Kenny Florian
Tito Ortiz
Chuck Liddell
Sean Sherk
Rich Franklin
Jason MacDonald
Chris Leben
Jon Fitch
|
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 02:46 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
-Lay Em Out-
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Draggin you into the PlazzVan
Posts: 1,976
|
I don't think the Iceman should retire just yet. Win, lose, or draw, I know he's still got some good fights in him. 
__________________
Loved By Few.....Hated By Many.....Respected By Nobody
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 02:47 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
MMA Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 143
|
I don't think it'll be an issue. I think he's going to destroy Evans. And I would say a retirement decision may be based on performance. If he gets tooled perhaps but if it's a great close fight why retire?
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 02:48 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
::Minotauro::
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,860
|
Win or loose Chuck is still a top fighter and a HUGE DRAW.. I think he should Retire when he feels fit to
__________________
Aboard:
NikosCC
Plazzman
Judoka
norway1
joppp
nevrsummr13
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 03:29 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Takedown, Dominate & Destroy
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Posts: 956
|
Hahaha god lose two fights in a row and everyone is ready to count you out for the rest of your career it seems these days. Tons of top guys have lost back to back and made huge come backs and even got their titles back.
Theres Randy Couture,Hughes, Sherk and tons more including Henderson. Chuck lost by flash knock out to Rampage who is one of the best in the world right now and not to mention it couldve happened to anyone.
Jardine on the other hand shouldnt have been hard for Chuck but it was just him not mentally their but then he comes back to dominate Wandy and people still doubt him? Whatever man whoever wrote the aticle must have been beaten in the head as a child. Chuck will be back for the KO no doubt.
__________________
Top 7 Favorite Fighters at the moment
1. Forrest Griffin
2. Clay Guida
3. Jon Fitch
4. Chuck Liddell
5. Amir Sadollah
6. Chris Leben
7. Dan Hardy
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 03:48 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Up-And-Comer
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,624
|
if chuck loses he should fight anderson silva.
if he loses to anderson silva I wouldn't blame him for taking some time off.
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 03:59 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Cleaning The Mats
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Branson, Missouri
Posts: 12,434
|
Chuck still has a few good fights left in him, so no, he shouldn't retire if he loses. Losing to Rashad, who is a really good fighter, isn't retirement worthy. Now, if Chuck were to lose to Shannon Ritch, then yes, he should retire.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 04:06 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
MMA Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20
|
I think the problem is that the LHW division is so damn packed with good fighters any show of weakness means the attention is stolen from you right away.
There are just too many remaining questions in that division and everybody is trying to cancel out anybody that makes a mistake to try and clarify the heads and tails of the situation.
Personally I think a lot of questions would be answered with a Grand Prix event.
Having said that though either way Chuck Liddell makes money and sells fights, it doesn't matter how good or bad he is as long as he's making money he's gonna be in the UFC.
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 04:45 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Working Jitz
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 900
|
i was not able to find the article, but i think suggesting that chuck should retire if he loses is plainly ridiculous! the telegraph should not be so fickle in its support of great fighters like chuck liddell.
this reminds me a little of similar talk about rich franklin after his second loss to silva, should he retire or change divisions or organizations and such. this type of thinking really angers me. what makes the difference between true champion fighters and those who simply fade away is that champions find a way to overcome and defeat adversity while others are defeated. that to me is the essence of a fighter, and to suggest that chuck simply go away should he lose is disrespectful to the sport in my mind. imagine what mma would be if any fighter who lost a fight he should have won simply quit...we would have no GSP, no BJ Penn, no Chuck Liddell, and no mma.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Telegraph says Liddell should retire if he loses
