Evan Tanner: Hall OF Fame - Page 3 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

View Poll Results: Halll of Fame
No Doubt 91 52.30%
Just came up Short 51 29.31%
NO WAY 32 18.39%
Voters: 174. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #21 of 155 (permalink) Old 09-09-2008, 05:46 PM
Resident Pyrotechnician
 
cplmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,766
                     
I've always been a big fan of Tanner, and his death is absolutely tragic but it does not in any way shape or form somehow qualify him for the UFC HOF. He's been a good fighter for a number of years with a huge heart and fan following, but his accomplishments in the Octagon just don't justify an HOF nod. Again, I really like Tanner and his death just flat out sucks but no on HOF.
cplmac is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 155 (permalink) Old 09-09-2008, 05:47 PM
GMW
International Stalker
 
GMW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 5,203
Blog Entries: 2
                     
No, he shouldn't be.


Credit to ThaMuffinMan
GMW is offline  
post #23 of 155 (permalink) Old 09-09-2008, 05:49 PM
Shogun=LHW Champ
 
ThaFranchise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 719
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisl972 View Post
I think that you're missing what Evan brought to the UFC. It was long before he died that he had fans that cared for him and longed for his return.

It seems that this is more of a case of people thinking that just because someone died, they did nothing while they lived, and that's pretty sad.

To say that he couldn't hang with Tito is quite silly. Evan got KOed by a slamming of heads during a slam. Tito won it fair and square, but to say that's reason enough to claim that Evan "couldn't hang" is quite moronic.

If you really look at Evan's life. The ups and downs, the way that he fought in and out of the ring, you would realize that his praise has very little to do with his death.

Go watch his fights, read up about him, and study the things that he said. THAT'S what we are talking about.
All Im saying is Evan never really beat a premier fighter so I dont think you could ever have him in the HOF.
ThaFranchise is offline  
post #24 of 155 (permalink) Old 09-09-2008, 06:01 PM
The Forum Drunk
 
xeberus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,450
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by cplmac View Post
I've always been a big fan of Tanner, and his death is absolutely tragic but it does not in any way shape or form somehow qualify him for the UFC HOF. He's been a good fighter for a number of years with a huge heart and fan following, but his accomplishments in the Octagon just don't justify an HOF nod. Again, I really like Tanner and his death just flat out sucks but no on HOF.
I agree. Its a damn shame he died. Much respect to him, he brought it every time he fought.



If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. ~ Thomas Jefferson


Sig by D.P.



xeberus is offline  
post #25 of 155 (permalink) Old 09-09-2008, 06:08 PM
Banned
 
bbjd7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Montclair, NJ
Posts: 11,605
Blog Entries: 3
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisl972 View Post
So, I take it you didn't vote for Coleman to get in...
I didn't think he was a great selection at all. Although I would say that Coleman is ahead of Tanner as far as deserving to be in the HOF.

I don't think Severn belongs in the HOF to.
bbjd7 is offline  
post #26 of 155 (permalink) Old 09-09-2008, 06:41 PM
 
Toxic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: See that guy over in the window, with the binoculars?
Posts: 21,821
                     
It really could go either way but personally because its close I think they should induct him due to the tragic circumstances surrounding his death and the fact he died while under contract to the UFC,




"If you get hit and it hurts hit him back you not knocked out yet."-Joe Doerksen
The Toxic Terrors (FFL)
Demetrious Johnson*Eduardo Dantas*Emanuel Newton*Will Brooks*Michael Page



Toxic is offline  
post #27 of 155 (permalink) Old 09-09-2008, 06:52 PM
Back In Black
 
Chrisl972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winter Haven, Fl
Posts: 4,185
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbjd7 View Post
I didn't think he was a great selection at all. Although I would say that Coleman is ahead of Tanner as far as deserving to be in the HOF.

I don't think Severn belongs in the HOF to.
Coleman had 9 fights in the UFC and won 6 (66.666%). His best wins were Frye, Goodridge and Severn. He fought in the UFC from 1996 - 1999.

Tanner had 17 fights in the UFC and won 11 (65%). His best wins were against Lawler, Baroni (twice) and Terrell. He fought in the UFC from 1999 - 2008.

Both were Champions in their division.

I think Tanner deserves it more for actual UFC stats.

Chrisl972 is offline  
post #28 of 155 (permalink) Old 09-09-2008, 06:55 PM
Cheers.
 
vandalian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,341
                     
I think Evan Tanner was a great fighter and I'll miss him very much.
But judging by the current standard, he isn't a hall-of-famer.
Right now, there's Ken Shamrock, Royce Gracie, Dan Severn, Mark Coleman and Randy Couture. It's a very short list of guys who were instrumental in making UFC what it is today.
Tanner's own accomplishments, while impressive, don't quite put him him in that league.
Maybe down the line, as the criteria widen and more deserving fighters have been inducted, adding Tanner will be more appropriate. But not yet.
I do, however, think UFC should pay tribute to him. He and his family deserve that.

Last edited by vandalian; 09-09-2008 at 07:00 PM.
vandalian is offline  
post #29 of 155 (permalink) Old 09-09-2008, 06:59 PM
Featherweight
 
illmatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,451
                     
While its sad we lost him I don't think someone who did something silly to get himself killed deserves a special place when he wouldn't have been considered for it if he were alive today. Don't say this is regardless of his life or death, because all the huge Tanner fans that magically appeared in the past two days sure weren't around singing his hall-of-famer praise before this happenned. You're reacting emotionally.
illmatic is offline  
post #30 of 155 (permalink) Old 09-09-2008, 07:00 PM
Banned
 
TheNegation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,809
                     
I liked Tanner and voted just came up short but think about how many votes this guy would have had if this poll had been posted a few days ago and I think you have your answer. No way at all tbh.
TheNegation is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome