Ranked Fighters. Has the time Come? - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

View Poll Results: Should the UFC officially rank its fighters
Yes 38 76.00%
No 12 24.00%
Voters: 50. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 26 (permalink) Old 10-26-2008, 02:17 PM Thread Starter
LEGEND
 
putmeonhold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,684
                     
Ranked Fighters. Has the time Come?

I'm not even %100 sure of my own opinion on this, so I figured why not put this question to all my MMA friends out there. Personally, I am leaning towards the opinion that I would really like to see the UFC institute a ranking system for its fighters. I can recall many title fights in the recent past that I do not feel were justified - although I am hoping this thread doesn't simply turn into a recount of all the fights we disagree with.

I would mention Kenny Florian vs. Sean Sherk for the lightweight title and also the upcoming Brock Lesnar vs Coture fight. I think we can all agree that there are fighters out there who are overdue for their "shot." I am thinking of guys such as Roger Heurta and Cheik Congo. I know we could all probably drop names for hours and we could all argue until we are blue in the face over who should have, and who shoiuldn't have had shots - but that is superficial.

It begs the question, WHOEVER you feel should or shouldn't have had a title shot --> would embracing a ranking system adress this issue? I believe it would, because there would be no dispute over who the number 1 contender is, and the number 1 conender would be challanging for the title. It would take the ability for the board room execs to hand pick which fights go down. But there are consequences to this. For example, if there were a ranking system - I don't believe that a season such as "TUF the Comeback" would even be a possibility. So, what do all you MMA experts out there think? Is it time for the UFC to officially rank its fighters?

Let's Bang!

Last edited by putmeonhold; 10-26-2008 at 05:24 PM. Reason: Needed to break the block of text up a bit
putmeonhold is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 26 (permalink) Old 10-26-2008, 05:20 PM
Face the Pain
 
Aaronyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 7,021
                     
many months ago i thought i heard dana white mention they were looking to get some official rankings....i haven't heard much sense....
Aaronyman is offline  
post #3 of 26 (permalink) Old 10-26-2008, 05:23 PM
Lightweight
Image Hosting by Picoodle.com
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,860
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaronyman View Post
many months ago i thought i heard dana white mention they were looking to get some official rankings....i haven't heard much sense....
that's probably because they decided to schedule a bunch of fights with non-top 10 guys fighting for championships.
69nites is offline  
post #4 of 26 (permalink) Old 10-26-2008, 05:34 PM Thread Starter
LEGEND
 
putmeonhold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,684
                     
Hahahahhaha

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69nites View Post
that's probably because they decided to schedule a bunch of fights with non-top 10 guys fighting for championships.
I agree %100. This whole heavy-weight spectacle is what finally prompted me to drop this thread. This mini-tournament is a freaking joke. The champ should be fighting the interim champ to establish who the real champ. Challenges can come afterward. And Brock should have to go through a few more fights before he gets a title shot IMO

Let's Bang!
putmeonhold is offline  
post #5 of 26 (permalink) Old 10-26-2008, 05:36 PM
Bantamweight
 
+Shogun+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 903
                     
Even if the UFC did implement a ranking system, they'd probably have guys that make them a boatload of money like Lesnar at the top, above people he shouldn't be and try justifying it somehow. I never cared for TUF winners getting title shots, or coaches for that matter. I'm not sure, it really depends how it's set up I guess.
+Shogun+ is offline  
post #6 of 26 (permalink) Old 10-26-2008, 06:04 PM
Flyweight
 
bubbleboy66's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Weatherford, OK
Posts: 248
 
The UFC is a business and wants to make the most money. If they ranked their fighters than they would lose opportunities to make super fights like Couture/Lesnar, since those two could not legitimately face each other in a ranking system.
Or the UFC could have rankings and they would be inaccurate and place fighters in Top 10 that didn't belong. So as long as UFC is still a business and not a league then I say no official rankings yet.
bubbleboy66 is offline  
post #7 of 26 (permalink) Old 10-26-2008, 06:18 PM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
 
Wouldn´t a ranking system open up for boring but efficient fighting styles?
As it is today the UFC keep putting exiting fighters in shows and thats a good thing right?
wup4ss is offline  
post #8 of 26 (permalink) Old 10-26-2008, 06:39 PM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2
 
The UFC does rank thier fighters, the top 10 anyway, but they do not make them pubilc. Only Joe Silva, Dana and probably the Fertitas accualy know.

On the other hand they don't always set up there matches with the fighters ranking in question, but how much money the fight can bring in. Which is why Keith Jadine will probably never get a title shot, and is one of the most underpaid fighters in the sport.
Morior23 is offline  
post #9 of 26 (permalink) Old 10-26-2008, 06:45 PM
Lightweight
Image Hosting by Picoodle.com
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,860
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morior23 View Post
The UFC does rank thier fighters, the top 10 anyway, but they do not make them pubilc. Only Joe Silva, Dana and probably the Fertitas accualy know.

On the other hand they don't always set up there matches with the fighters ranking in question, but how much money the fight can bring in. Which is why Keith Jadine will probably never get a title shot, and is one of the most underpaid fighters in the sport.
Jardine is underpaid because he signed a long term contract too early in his career.
69nites is offline  
post #10 of 26 (permalink) Old 10-26-2008, 09:19 PM Thread Starter
LEGEND
 
putmeonhold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,684
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbleboy66 View Post
The UFC is a business and wants to make the most money. If they ranked their fighters than they would lose opportunities to make super fights like Couture/Lesnar, since those two could not legitimately face each other in a ranking system.
Or the UFC could have rankings and they would be inaccurate and place fighters in Top 10 that didn't belong. So as long as UFC is still a business and not a league then I say no official rankings yet.
The responses to this thread are exactly what I was hoping for. This is an excellent debate with some good points brought up that I otherwise would have never thought of. I must say though, I don't think it would prevent any big ticket fights from going down --> but it would perhaps delay them i.e. Brock Lesnar would have to work his way up the rankings, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't end up fighting the champ after a year or 2. I truely believe the product in the Octagon would improve and thus buisness would be better for the UFC in the end. the problem for me is, by setting up a Huerta vs. Kenflo matchup instead of Huerta Penn --> where does that leave Ken and Roger now? --> now that Huerta lost that is. IMO Huerta is still higher in the food chain than Kenflo, even if he did lose to him, but now he can't have a shot because he lost --> and kenflo certainly doesn't deserve a shot, so they both lose out in the end, and so do the fans. Any other thoughts?

Let's Bang!

Last edited by putmeonhold; 10-26-2008 at 09:22 PM. Reason: Spelling error
putmeonhold is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome