|
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books.
UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.
 |
|
11-08-2008, 08:47 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Punishment
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 5,360
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GKY
I would be shocked if he beat Nog. On a rankings system I would put him at #2 because he would deserve it. If Mir wins though and he beats Mir (he definitely would) it would be more like #4.
Also, I would be eager to see Gonzaga rip his arm off and become champion.
|
He would definately beat Mir? From what I remember Mir or Mur as Brock likes to call him made Brock tap the first time they fought.
__________________
[  |
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 09:23 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Cheesy Poofs
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,588
|
How could anyone with a 4-1 record be ranked #2??
I mean, Nog and Randy would definitely be quality wins and definitely place him in the top 10, probably top 5. But he still isn't deserving of #2 with such a short record, right?
He still needs to fight more guys in the division. Barnett could beat him, I believe Gonzaga could beat him, Velasquez, Sylvia, maybe Carwin....
Shouldn't a fighter be thoroughly tested before rocketing up to a #2 ranking?
__________________
Don Frye's Mustache > Kimbo's Beard
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 09:25 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Bantamweight
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 961
|
As someone who severly dislikes Brock, I have to say you foregt wrestling can be used backwards.
He would likey keep it standing and maybe clinch him, and from there just KO him. He would be a fool otherwise.
__________________
Forum Bets: 2-0
__________________________ 
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 09:26 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
Super Heavyweight
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,622
|
It points out the problem with the HW division in MMA as a whole. Brock could easily be ranked #2-4 based on if you put Barnet and/or Arlovski in front of him.
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 09:33 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Amatuer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Detroit
Posts: 198
|
The Brock Lesner fellating has elevated beyond reason. Again, the man has beaten all of Heath Herring in his illustrious MMA career. This thread shouldn't exist.
__________________
Lesnar is a savage and I, BCooper, am his biggest fan. Destruction tried to tell me Randy was too old, but I wouldnt listen.
Yes, I lost a sig bet.
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 09:33 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: See that guy over in the window, with the binoculars?
Posts: 19,698
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stitch1z
How could anyone with a 4-1 record be ranked #2??
I mean, Nog and Randy would definitely be quality wins and definitely place him in the top 10, probably top 5. But he still isn't deserving of #2 with such a short record, right?
He still needs to fight more guys in the division. Barnett could beat him, I believe Gonzaga could beat him, Velasquez, Sylvia, maybe Carwin....
Shouldn't a fighter be thoroughly tested before rocketing up to a #2 ranking?
|
Velasquez? You think if Lesnar managed to beat Couture nad Nog that Velasquez would stop him?WTF
__________________
"If you get hit and it hurts hit him back you not knocked out yet."-Joe Doerksen The Toxic Terrors (FFL) Georges St. Pierre*Sarra McMann*Pat Curran*Patricio Freire*Uriah Hall
NP FFL Team Toxic Challenge Fabricio Werdum*Gilbert Melendez*Rick Hawn*John Dodson*Urijah Faber
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 09:47 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Featherweight
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 977
|
It wouldn't matter how many fights he has. If you beat the top ranked guy's you become a top ranked guy. If you beat the #1 and #2 guy's in your division you undoubtly become the #1 guy in your division regardless of your experience or percieved skill set. Thats how a real ranking system works.
Of course all MMA ranking is BS and is based more on who likes who and who some guy on a web site thinks will beat whom rather than any actual standardized system of wins and loses.
__________________
"Nothing like a strangulation to get the circulation going."
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 10:03 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Super Heavyweight
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,079
|
Velasquez LOL
Dude if he beats up randy and nog u think Velasquez will stop him? 
imo def not 2 but i would rank him 3 or 4 imho , i am sure if brock beats nog/randy he will easily take out AA . it will be fun to see barnett vs brock
BUT seriously its MMA ... so anything can happen |
|
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 10:03 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: banned
Posts: 0
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stitch1z
How could anyone with a 4-1 record be ranked #2??
I mean, Nog and Randy would definitely be quality wins and definitely place him in the top 10, probably top 5. But he still isn't deserving of #2 with such a short record, right?
He still needs to fight more guys in the division. Barnett could beat him, I believe Gonzaga could beat him, Velasquez, Sylvia, maybe Carwin....
Shouldn't a fighter be thoroughly tested before rocketing up to a #2 ranking?
|
Maybe cuz the heavyweight division doesnt really have anyone in it and the only guys that Brock has fought are top tier guys.......I would put him at 3...dunno i dont see him beating Fedor and i think he would get caught again not k/o but submitted...  |
|
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 10:33 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
Super Heavyweight
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,622
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stitch1z
How could anyone with a 4-1 record be ranked #2??
I mean, Nog and Randy would definitely be quality wins and definitely place him in the top 10, probably top 5. But he still isn't deserving of #2 with such a short record, right?
He still needs to fight more guys in the division. Barnett could beat him, I believe Gonzaga could beat him, Velasquez, Sylvia, maybe Carwin....
Shouldn't a fighter be thoroughly tested before rocketing up to a #2 ranking?
|
I'd rather a guy be ranked #2 for having fought the best in the division and won than have a record of 40-0 and fought no one like most boxers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
How would you feel if???
