How would you feel if??? - Page 3 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #21 of 51 (permalink) Old 11-08-2008, 09:47 PM
Punishment
 
The Legend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 5,360
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by GKY View Post
I would be shocked if he beat Nog. On a rankings system I would put him at #2 because he would deserve it. If Mir wins though and he beats Mir (he definitely would) it would be more like #4.

Also, I would be eager to see Gonzaga rip his arm off and become champion.
He would definately beat Mir? From what I remember Mir or Mur as Brock likes to call him made Brock tap the first time they fought.

[
The Legend is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 51 (permalink) Old 11-08-2008, 10:23 PM
Cheesy Poofs
 
stitch1z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,588
                     
How could anyone with a 4-1 record be ranked #2??

I mean, Nog and Randy would definitely be quality wins and definitely place him in the top 10, probably top 5. But he still isn't deserving of #2 with such a short record, right?

He still needs to fight more guys in the division. Barnett could beat him, I believe Gonzaga could beat him, Velasquez, Sylvia, maybe Carwin....

Shouldn't a fighter be thoroughly tested before rocketing up to a #2 ranking?




Don Frye's Mustache > Kimbo's Beard
stitch1z is offline  
post #23 of 51 (permalink) Old 11-08-2008, 10:25 PM
GKY
Bantamweight
 
GKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 962
                     
As someone who severly dislikes Brock, I have to say you foregt wrestling can be used backwards.

He would likey keep it standing and maybe clinch him, and from there just KO him. He would be a fool otherwise.

Forum Bets: 2-0

__________________________
GKY is offline  
post #24 of 51 (permalink) Old 11-08-2008, 10:26 PM
Megaweight
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,499
                     
It points out the problem with the HW division in MMA as a whole. Brock could easily be ranked #2-4 based on if you put Barnet and/or Arlovski in front of him.
cdtcpl is offline  
post #25 of 51 (permalink) Old 11-08-2008, 10:33 PM
Amatuer
 
BCooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Detroit
Posts: 198
                     
The Brock Lesner fellating has elevated beyond reason. Again, the man has beaten all of Heath Herring in his illustrious MMA career. This thread shouldn't exist.

Lesnar is a savage and I, BCooper, am his biggest fan. Destruction tried to tell me Randy was too old, but I wouldnt listen.

Yes, I lost a sig bet.
BCooper is offline  
post #26 of 51 (permalink) Old 11-08-2008, 10:33 PM
 
Toxic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: See that guy over in the window, with the binoculars?
Posts: 21,821
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by stitch1z View Post
How could anyone with a 4-1 record be ranked #2??

I mean, Nog and Randy would definitely be quality wins and definitely place him in the top 10, probably top 5. But he still isn't deserving of #2 with such a short record, right?

He still needs to fight more guys in the division. Barnett could beat him, I believe Gonzaga could beat him, Velasquez, Sylvia, maybe Carwin....

Shouldn't a fighter be thoroughly tested before rocketing up to a #2 ranking?
Velasquez? You think if Lesnar managed to beat Couture nad Nog that Velasquez would stop him?WTF




"If you get hit and it hurts hit him back you not knocked out yet."-Joe Doerksen
The Toxic Terrors (FFL)
Demetrious Johnson*Eduardo Dantas*Emanuel Newton*Will Brooks*Michael Page



Toxic is offline  
post #27 of 51 (permalink) Old 11-08-2008, 10:47 PM
Featherweight
 
Charles Lee Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 977
                     
It wouldn't matter how many fights he has. If you beat the top ranked guy's you become a top ranked guy. If you beat the #1 and #2 guy's in your division you undoubtly become the #1 guy in your division regardless of your experience or percieved skill set. Thats how a real ranking system works.


Of course all MMA ranking is BS and is based more on who likes who and who some guy on a web site thinks will beat whom rather than any actual standardized system of wins and loses.

"Nothing like a strangulation to get the circulation going."
Charles Lee Ray is offline  
post #28 of 51 (permalink) Old 11-08-2008, 11:03 PM
Super Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,079
                     
Velasquez LOL
Dude if he beats up randy and nog u think Velasquez will stop him?
imo def not 2 but i would rank him 3 or 4 imho , i am sure if brock beats nog/randy he will easily take out AA . it will be fun to see barnett vs brock

BUT seriously its MMA ... so anything can happen
dontazo is offline  
post #29 of 51 (permalink) Old 11-08-2008, 11:03 PM
Banned
 
coldcall420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: banned
Posts: 0
Blog Entries: 1
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by stitch1z View Post
How could anyone with a 4-1 record be ranked #2??

I mean, Nog and Randy would definitely be quality wins and definitely place him in the top 10, probably top 5. But he still isn't deserving of #2 with such a short record, right?

He still needs to fight more guys in the division. Barnett could beat him, I believe Gonzaga could beat him, Velasquez, Sylvia, maybe Carwin....

Shouldn't a fighter be thoroughly tested before rocketing up to a #2 ranking?

Maybe cuz the heavyweight division doesnt really have anyone in it and the only guys that Brock has fought are top tier guys.......I would put him at 3...dunno i dont see him beating Fedor and i think he would get caught again not k/o but submitted...
coldcall420 is offline  
post #30 of 51 (permalink) Old 11-08-2008, 11:33 PM
Megaweight
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,499
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by stitch1z View Post
How could anyone with a 4-1 record be ranked #2??

I mean, Nog and Randy would definitely be quality wins and definitely place him in the top 10, probably top 5. But he still isn't deserving of #2 with such a short record, right?

He still needs to fight more guys in the division. Barnett could beat him, I believe Gonzaga could beat him, Velasquez, Sylvia, maybe Carwin....

Shouldn't a fighter be thoroughly tested before rocketing up to a #2 ranking?
I'd rather a guy be ranked #2 for having fought the best in the division and won than have a record of 40-0 and fought no one like most boxers.
cdtcpl is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome