dana's BS'ing knows no bounds - Page 4 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #31 of 38 (permalink) Old 11-28-2008, 12:55 AM
WTF Chuck, Fight Me!
 
Split's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,784
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philivey2k8 View Post
he's cut down the roster from 300 to 180, and is probably going down to 140, claiming "hard economic times" as the reason why.

which is all BS.

most of the fighters he cuts probably make 8 grand a fight, which costs less than a night of drunken house trashing by the TUF cast, who, in the end, are mostly gonna be cut from the UFC anyway!

i personally like some of the roster trimming (bye bye georgie ), but dana's reasons are bullsh*t!
So you agree to the cut, but not the reasons? So why do you care?

If your point was that Dana White is bs, i guess i agree with you then, but not in this case. Its quite obvious, at least for me, that Dana White is not the one taking those decisions. If it was him, there would of been a f*ck somewhere in his statements, or insulting somebody.

I dont understand however how cutting fighters reduces the payroll. So im actually asking here, can somebody explain?

The way i see it, in 1 event, you have a certain amount of fights, and no matter who fights, there is, if there is 7 fights, 14 fighters to pay.

How is it different if you cut a guy that is paid 9K, if you replace him by another that is paid 9K as well? If you cut a guy that is worth more than he should(example, cro cop, etc), then i would somehow understand(which is probably what happened in Werdum.. you can agree or not agree, it was about him being overpaid). Right now he is just cutting fighters that are either not 'worthy' of being in the UFC, or fighters that nobody cares about. I dont understand what it changes.. its not like fighters had salaries by the day right?..


The way i see it, this means UFC fights will have more undercard fights, and less PPV fights.

Bring back knees strikes on grounded opponents.. Give me good arguments for not having them for crying out loud.

THINK YOU CAN MANAGE AN MMA TEAM? Click Here!

BORED AND NEED AN EASY GAME? Click Here!
Split is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 38 (permalink) Old 11-28-2008, 01:19 AM
<= MODERATOR=>
 
Xerxes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,224
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Split View Post
I dont understand however how cutting fighters reduces the payroll. So im actually asking here, can somebody explain?

The way i see it, this means UFC fights will have more undercard fights, and less PPV fights.
You ask a good question and almost provided the answer to it.

The UFC cuts fighters because as long as the economy will be shitty, they'll be having less events. They prefer getting rid of the fighters rather than keeping them on the side with longer layoffs and having to deal with their managers constantly asking and nagging "so when are my fighters going to fight again?" etc. It's better for everybody. Way I see it... What I'm pretty sure about is we'll be having less (PPV) events in the future (that's why they're laying off)
Xerxes is offline  
post #33 of 38 (permalink) Old 11-28-2008, 03:09 AM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 32
   
I actually agree with the cuts for the most part and also with a lot of the fighters who are being cut or that are on the block, Bottom line the UFC is top dog and no matter if you were once great and in a slump now, Unless you managed to pull a lot of fans in your time if you lose fights ya gotta go to make way for someone who is gonna produce results. When/if you get your act together or drop your asking price to suit your performance then I am sure some of them will return.

Not to mention the factor of having a smaller pool of fighters creates more of a "Meta game" where as having to many just makes a cluster ****.

Also I think its better for MMA over all that fighters are being cut(Possibly some big names), I think for awhile now the UFC has been securing its monopoly to ensure the staying power of the company but now with the economy being not great and almost all other attempts from competing companies failing they are finally just cutting the loose strings and leveling out. Which in the long run (Using the failed business models of other attempts as what not to do) when the economy picks back up I think we will be seeing at least one company rise and most likely have staying power with a large amount of free agents to pick from...
Mysen is offline  
post #34 of 38 (permalink) Old 11-28-2008, 07:47 AM
RNC - the fighting mans lullaby
 
The Lone Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Somewhere between Hell and Earth
Posts: 1,822
                     
I dont think it makes great business sense in some respects though. Surely its better to lessen your profits and keep the fighters, rather than release them and have them strengthen your rivals card and organisations? I mean, Affliction could start posing a threat to the UFC if they can find a good business plan
The Lone Wolf is offline  
post #35 of 38 (permalink) Old 11-28-2008, 12:04 PM
Heavyweight
 
e-thug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 3,896
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lone Wolf View Post
I dont think it makes great business sense in some respects though. Surely its better to lessen your profits and keep the fighters, rather than release them and have them strengthen your rivals card and organisations? I mean, Affliction could start posing a threat to the UFC if they can find a good business plan
That is a huge if, Affliction has had one "big" card and thats it, until they have a profitable event I dont see them as a threat. With the financial crisis they will struggle.

I agree with the cuts, if the UFC aint gonna use them then they might aswell give them the opportunity to fight elsewhere.
e-thug is offline  
post #36 of 38 (permalink) Old 11-28-2008, 12:17 PM
Lightweight
 
Scarecrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Water-boarding some liberals...
Posts: 1,604
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philivey2k8 View Post
if you're gonna neg rep, at least leave a name


you're an idiot


without dana you wouldn't have a UFC
Sign up for premium...you can see who reps you.

Oh, and + rep to make up for the negs...
Scarecrow is offline  
post #37 of 38 (permalink) Old 11-28-2008, 01:16 PM
Super Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,079
                     
anyone care about rep ? lol
dontazo is offline  
post #38 of 38 (permalink) Old 11-29-2008, 03:21 PM
Amatuer
 
VoiceOfThunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 192
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by e-thug View Post
... if the UFC aint gonna use them then they might as well give them the opportunity to fight elsewhere.
A win win situation. Good point.

!!!Zhang Fei Is Here!!!
VoiceOfThunder is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome