Are the Rules of UFC more geard towards wrestlers? - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-06-2006, 04:29 PM Thread Starter
Bantamweight
 
daman5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 598
                     
Are the Rules of UFC more geard towards wrestlers?

I say this because UFC socre the take downs and looks at the control....


But, there are a lot of fighters who are more comfortable on their backs, and are willing to take the hits so they can submit their fighter.... but thats not counted in UFC, it's really only looked at on who is on top....


So, should UFC count submittal attemps also?

For most of you, ignorance is bliss, but for me it's about the truth.

Bets won:
4-0, Admins taken down in bets 2 (asskicker, Jdun11)
daman5 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-06-2006, 04:56 PM
Amatuer
 
sxrxnrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 190
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by daman5
I say this because UFC socre the take downs and looks at the control....


But, there are a lot of fighters who are more comfortable on their backs, and are willing to take the hits so they can submit their fighter.... but thats not counted in UFC, it's really only looked at on who is on top....


So, should UFC count submittal attemps also?
Yes, the UFC is geared towards wrestlers, however fighting is geared towards wrestling. If you can take somebody down and rain punches down on them you have the advantage, even if those punches are not as strong because you are in somebody elses gaurd.

The most dominant person in pride is a wrestler, and in pride the rules are less geared towards wrestling than the UFC, the cage and elbows really help wrestlers.

I think that submissions count when they work because you submit your oppennt. However if you try for submissions and fail they are still counted because it count for agression. Although I dont think they give as much credit to the guy on the bottom as they should.

I would hate to see a drastic change in the scoring to give the advantage to grapplers, I would however like to see the refs bring the fight back to the feet faster than they usally do when you have a lazy wrestler on top.
sxrxnrr is offline  
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-06-2006, 05:52 PM
Amatuer
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 133
 
If the submission guy wanted to be on his back, is put there, and doesn't do anything from there, should he get points anyways? Of course he got put where he want, but if he can't successfully submit his opponent, what good was it to be in this position? You most likely didn't outdamage your opponent.

Favorite Fighters
LW: BJ PENN & Roger Huerta
WW: Jon Fitch
MW: Rich Franklin
LHW: Tito Ortiz
HW: Fedor Emelianenko & Randy Couture
Esotera is offline  
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-06-2006, 05:57 PM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 52
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esotera
If the submission guy wanted to be on his back, is put there, and doesn't do anything from there, should he get points anyways? Of course he got put where he want, but if he can't successfully submit his opponent, what good was it to be in this position? You most likely didn't outdamage your opponent.
Thats a specific scenario, one in which the fighter on the bottom would lose as he is not accomplishing anything. Dominant position is the top, and it is from there that a fight can be ended more easily. All grapplers tell you to fight from the top if you can, regardless of the art they practice. I am glad to see points for top position simply because it shows control of the fight, very few guys can control where a fight goes from the bottom... control is worth points.
Bob Sacramento is offline  
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-06-2006, 07:41 PM Thread Starter
Bantamweight
 
daman5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 598
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Sacramento
Thats a specific scenario, one in which the fighter on the bottom would lose as he is not accomplishing anything. Dominant position is the top, and it is from there that a fight can be ended more easily. All grapplers tell you to fight from the top if you can, regardless of the art they practice. I am glad to see points for top position simply because it shows control of the fight, very few guys can control where a fight goes from the bottom... control is worth points.

Ture. but isn't the whole point of having a fight, is to finish the fight... because there a a lot of wrestlers out there who have top position and dont inflict enough damage to hurt someone, but since they are on top they win.. when a grappler is used to being on his back and defending from there and waiting for the right time to strike.

And yes, there should be more push for fighters who are on the top doing nothing and stalling wanting time to waste so they can win the fight...

but i still think points should be awarded for trying to finish their opponet, and not just because they are on top.

For most of you, ignorance is bliss, but for me it's about the truth.

Bets won:
4-0, Admins taken down in bets 2 (asskicker, Jdun11)
daman5 is offline  
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-06-2006, 08:52 PM
The American Psycho
 
Bonnar426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,272
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by daman5
Ture. but isn't the whole point of having a fight, is to finish the fight... because there a a lot of wrestlers out there who have top position and dont inflict enough damage to hurt someone, but since they are on top they win.. when a grappler is used to being on his back and defending from there and waiting for the right time to strike.

And yes, there should be more push for fighters who are on the top doing nothing and stalling wanting time to waste so they can win the fight...

but i still think points should be awarded for trying to finish their opponet, and not just because they are on top.
Exactly! I'm probably going to get my balls busted for saying this but the Penn vs. St. Pierre fight is a prime example! St. Pierre had more takedowns on Penn but really didn't acomplish anything on the ground! BJ did the more damage and even tried to put St. Pierre in a submission hold but GSP still won that fight! I still think BJ should have won that fight regardless how many times GSP took him down!

You forget that this isn't just some brutal sport where everyones out to kill each other. Its much more like a game of physical chess.-looney liam
Bonnar426 is offline  
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-06-2006, 08:56 PM
Banned
 
AtomDanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NOwhere
Posts: 2,317
   
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonnar426
Exactly! I'm probably going to get my balls busted for saying this but the Penn vs. St. Pierre fight is a prime example! St. Pierre had more takedowns on Penn but really didn't acomplish anything on the ground! BJ did the more damage and even tried to put St. Pierre in a submission hold but GSP still won that fight! I still think BJ should have won that fight regardless how many times GSP took him down!

I agree about the GSP thing, he didn't do anything with his takedowns after they were on the ground.
AtomDanger is offline  
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-06-2006, 09:28 PM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 52
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtomDanger
I agree about the GSP thing, he didn't do anything with his takedowns after they were on the ground.
You guys are right, Penn was defending well, but the points go to GSP for actually trying to hurt Penn, while fewer, if any, points were awarded to Penn for trying to defend GSP's attacks while on top. The idea of points going to the guy on top is because 99% of fighters want to be on top, so the one who achieves top position is the one in control, even if he fails to accomplish anything while there. Its the control that the judges see and reward.
Bob Sacramento is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome