Is loss good for Matt Hughes? - Page 2 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

View Poll Results: Is loss good for Matt Hughes?
Yes 17 48.57%
No 18 51.43%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 09:57 AM
Mr. 420
 
Ebc_Kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 1,360
                     
I don't think so.
Ebc_Kyle is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 10:41 AM
Sensei
 
jamlena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New England (RI)
Posts: 2,359
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Touesnard
Who's Matt Hughes???

but seriously I hope Matt learns and adjusts because IMO he was becoming extremely arrogant.

You can't have everything. Where would you put it?



Favorite Fighters:

Chuck Liddell
Rich Franklin
Diego Sanchez
jamlena is offline  
post #13 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 10:48 AM
Amatuer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 170
 
Overall I think it may be good for him. Being dominant for so long has to inflate your ego a bit, no matter who you are. Maybe this loss might make him ralize that he isn't invincible and they are some holes in his game. That being said, I don't think he can beat GSP in a rubber match. GSP is on a whole other level right now. He's without a doubt the best in the world at 170.
NICK C is offline  
post #14 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 10:48 AM
Lightweight
 
herton17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London,ON
Posts: 1,546
           
Yes, he was being a prick; yes, he was arrogant - but nothing was gonna save him last night. Bigger, stronger(maybe), quicker, better reach, amazing cardio and better all around skills. Thats the advantages GSP has over Hughes. And I think Hughes was faking those low blows just to get GSP off his game (get in his head because he couldnt do it outside the ring). He was a great champ, but the torch wasnt passed, it was ripped out of his hands....
herton17 is offline  
post #15 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 10:49 AM
Bantamweight
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 542
       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonnar426
I think the one thing we can all agree on is that Matt Hughes can get pretty arrogant! That is his one weakness! Matt said he could beat GSP standing up and on the ground! Tonight, he put that standing up theory to the test and he paid dearly for it!

This isn't the first time this happened! He seriously underestimated BJ Penn the first time around and he got destroyed! After that I think he realized he can't underestimate his opponents and he dominated his entire weight class! After awhile however he got more and more cocky with each win! After he beat BJ Penn in thier second fight his overconfidence shot through the roof and went out into space! Now once again he paid the price for it!

Do you think this loss will be good for him? I think so because his overconfidence has been brought down several pegs! I think he learned that you can't underestimate an opponent like that. If he did realize that then he will be a stronger fighter for it! At least that is my opinion! What do you think?
At this point in his career, I would have to say no. I think Matt was really trying, I don't believe he underestimated George or believed he should strike with him. If you watched the fight, you could see that Hughes was looking for openings. George kept him away with superior kick boxing and the one time Hughes tried to take him down George just looked too strong and stopped him cold. I think you are just looking at one fighter who is just on another level. Mark my words, Matt Hughes will NOT defeat GSP again
Slick_Fugitive is offline  
post #16 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 10:52 AM
Bantamweight
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 542
       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calibretto9
No, I think the loss is bad for Hughes.

First, I think a rubber match could be a disaster for him. GSP has developed his game to such an extent that I think even Hughes would have a hard time controlling him on the ground. Hughes has poor standup, and if he can't take GSP down (check out GSP's air sprawl - he's ready to defend a takedown) he's going to get rocked again.

Secondly, I was not convinced of Hughes' victory over Penn. I think Hughes lost the first 2 rounds, and then won after Penn separated his rib by slipping out. Even the Trigg victory was a little iffy - I mean he was locked in. If Trigg could've held out he was going to sleep. This isn't knocking Hughes - Hughes is a great fighter who trains well, but he hasn't walked through his last opponents (Excluding Royce who was way too old) with ease. Now he's going to have to come back up through those guys and he may not make it through the gauntlet.

I don't know - I think Matt Hughes trains hard and has shown a heart to win. On the other hand, I think his only real strength is his wrestling. He's a powerful wrestler, but his standup is poor. I really like the champion to be the guy who exemplifies the best in every aspect of the sport. A guy who has mastered standup, wrestling, submissions, training, and who has a class act. Someone like GSP.
That's a great post man - amen
Slick_Fugitive is offline  
post #17 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-19-2006, 10:53 AM
Amatuer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 170
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by herton17
Yes, he was being a prick; yes, he was arrogant - but nothing was gonna save him last night. Bigger, stronger(maybe), quicker, better reach, amazing cardio and better all around skills. Thats the advantages GSP has over Hughes. And I think Hughes was faking those low blows just to get GSP off his game (get in his head because he couldnt do it outside the ring). He was a great champ, but the torch wasnt passed, it was ripped out of his hands....
I don't know if Hughes faked the low blows or not. But you could definitely see that they affected GSP, just by looking at his face when John McCarthy was talking to him. I thought it would make him tentative but luckily he shook it off and went with the high kick instead.
NICK C is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome