Back of the head punches - Page 3 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #21 of 47 (permalink) Old 09-22-2009, 01:17 PM
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 102
Originally Posted by Michael Carson View Post
Jones vs. Bonnar is the perfect example. He uses that nice spinning elbow to hit Bonnar, but it ended up hitting him in the back of the head. It wasn't illegal as it was in motion, you cannot tell where that hit was going to go, it's impossible to know.
It was technically illegal, but it wasn't intentional and they were not in a position where it was likely to happen again. I think those are the defining factors; intent and likelihood of recurrence. As I said earlier, what I don't understand is the recent trend to overlook it in a final flurry that leads to a TKO.
Brainshank is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #22 of 47 (permalink) Old 09-22-2009, 02:29 PM
ufcrules's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 721
VERY tough to referee. Possibly the toughest. Especially when guys are trying to finish. It can be a wild flurry and frankly, hard to see until you have the luxury of slow-mo replay which the refs never have. Generally, I think UFC refs do a great job.
ufcrules is offline  
post #23 of 47 (permalink) Old 09-22-2009, 02:42 PM
steveo412's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,422
I thought maybe the new instant replay rule might come into effect in the Belfort Franklin fight. Like Franklin might have been out before he hit the ground but Belfort landed 2-3 strikes right in the back of his head before the round was over which was definetly illegal and could have been avoided.
steveo412 is offline  
post #24 of 47 (permalink) Old 09-22-2009, 02:46 PM
Super Ultra Great Delicious Wonderful
osmium's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 6,517
They should stop the fight for illegal blows more often you shouldn't let someone take advantage of cheating to finish a fight just because they only cheated once or twice. I see fights all the time where in GNP guys are reigning down illegal blows in a wild flurry and the fight gets awarded to them when it clearly impacted the finish.
osmium is offline  
post #25 of 47 (permalink) Old 09-23-2009, 09:47 PM
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 146
Originally Posted by Sicilian_Esq View Post
The back of the head is just that strip that extands from the spine... it's really not that big an area.

Unless you have the Ham Hands of Lesnar...
Actually this is no longer the case. The association of boxing commissions clarified the back of the head as strip you refer to with a band that extends the width of the base of the skull to both ears.
mma_official is offline  
post #26 of 47 (permalink) Old 09-24-2009, 12:30 AM
taz1458's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Franklin, PA
Posts: 144
It is interesting...I've seen the back of the head dela quite a bit lately.

Let's Go Broncos, Penguins, Penn State, Red Sox, Tony Stewart & Forrest Griffin!!
Proud Member of the US Navy Seabees since 8/15/06
taz1458 is offline  
post #27 of 47 (permalink) Old 09-24-2009, 03:30 AM
Light Heavyweight
name goes here's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London England
Posts: 3,300
I don't agree with it as a rule.

name goes here is offline  
post #28 of 47 (permalink) Old 09-24-2009, 11:42 AM
Necks are for sheep
Breadfan's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 734
I'm pretty sure I most recently heard that if a glove is touching the ear, it's a legal punch.

essentially the "back of the head" consists of Chuck's Mohawk from the base up to the top of his head.

Thanks to
For the Sig!

Favorite Fighters:

Breadfan is offline  
post #29 of 47 (permalink) Old 09-24-2009, 02:23 PM
Soakked's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,446
Originally Posted by khoveraki View Post
Eh... it's more manly to let them just hit you in the face? It's a natural response to tuck your head in like that, the fact that it's illegal is just a bonus.
Who said anything about manlyness? It's might be a natural response to tuck your head, but it's also a natural response to hit an opponent anywhere that would finish him. Now one is illegal and one is not, which is fine as it should be. But my beef about it is that it looks like it's being used as a defensive tactic, or loop hole to exploit. To me it's not real fighting because in a street fight you would not willingly give the back of your head to someone. I know I know this is a sport and not a street fight, but I still feel like it's taking advantage of a rule in place that's suppost to protect a fighter, not allow him another defensive option.
Soakked is offline  
post #30 of 47 (permalink) Old 09-29-2009, 11:00 AM
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 146
Originally Posted by Breadfan View Post
I'm pretty sure I most recently heard that if a glove is touching the ear, it's a legal punch.

essentially the "back of the head" consists of Chuck's Mohawk from the base up to the top of his head.
That used to be the model. Now it would be a mohawk with a triagle wedge that goes from ear to ear in the back and comes down to cover the entire base of the skull. You can see it here on page 10.
mma_official is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome