What kinda evidence are you looking for badass? Because as far as MMA goes, the only evidence (besides opinions on who is better.....Nog has better BJJ and stand up than most UFC fighters) is subjective. What kinda evidence do you want sweetheart?
Edit: Further more, if you think I'm wrong, sig bet me dude.
I'll take that sig bet. I love how people use "going the distance" against Fedor as proof of Nog's greatness. Getting beat up like a red-headed stepchild for half an hour without landing so much as a slap isn't something to be proud of. Yeah he had a great chin, but what good is that against someone with sub-defence, if all it does is get you beat up longer? Beating a 47 year old Couture on a losing streak doesn't cut it either.
Despite claims to the contrary, Nog does NOT have very good standup. In 38 fights, he has only one KO (over a nodody MW) and 1 TKO (over a 1-4 can). Every decent standup HW like Timmy, CroCop, Herring, Fedor, Mir and even Sapp has destroyed him on the feet. Noguiera's saving grace has always been that he had a good chin and eventually managed to get it to the ground, where he'd sub guys without BJJ creds.
Gonzaga is not one of those guys ... he has excellent BJJ himself and is not likely to get subbed by Nog. His standup is FAR superior and he is a much bigger, stronger guy, the type that Nog has always struggled with when they have any degree of sub defence.
Let me know if you accept the sig bet.. if you do, how bout it goes for two PPVs? And let's not make the sig too nasty.