The pros and cons of an MMA monopoly by one association - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-10-2009, 12:26 AM Thread Starter
Bantamweight
 
Mr. Sparkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 933
                     
The pros and cons of an MMA monopoly by one association

In short - fans win (we get the fights we want), fighters lose (money and bargaining ability).

What I am getting at is when the UFC bought Pride, I think we all thought, finally, the best will be fighting the best. Now with Strikeforce/Affliction, etc, there is a division again and if fighters are not happy in one place they hop to another. I hope and pray that we do not get into a boxing scenario with an alphabet soup of champions.

Are we living in the dwindling golden age of MMA? Will the fights we really want to see never happen, or happen well past their best before date. What is the solution to this? Could there be an over site committee ensuring the best fighters meeting in a timely fashion? Is it possible?

I truly feel that something needs to be done fast to keep each new association that pops up from veering off the path and claiming that they have the true champion in each division.

Thoughts?
Mr. Sparkle is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-10-2009, 12:35 AM
ROCKET FISTS
 
khoveraki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,743
                     
Disagree. Also remember that Affliction is done.


Competition is EXTREMELY important. If the UFC was the only one, we might maybe get to see some uninhibited fights. But, I'm sure we'll pay out the ass for them and there won't be much pressure for the UFC to deliver.

This huge free card was a big incentive. It's possibly a reason Couture/Vera is free and the definite reason for UFC "Main Events" that counter programmed it.

I think that co-promotion is a good idea occasionally. Maybe get the UFC and Strikeforce to put on a fight once a year for the fans. It could have Fedor v Lesnar, Rogers vs JDS, Mir vs Werdum, Mousasi vs Machida, Hendo vs Silva II, Mayhem vs Alves, Shields vs Fitch...



For cliffs: Competition is really important, in the long run and the short run. In the shortrun, we have two companies trying to outdo eachother in production value and fighter quality.

In the longrun we have more fighters able to fight routinely enough to be professionals = more quality. And with competition comes more competitive pay, which is incentive for higher quality athletes to go to MMA.
khoveraki is offline  
post #3 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-10-2009, 04:16 AM
Super Heavyweight
 
Judoka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,379
                     
Fans win? In a monopoly, we have the stfu and follow the UFC, they have the power as the big number 1, they do listen to the fans obviously but aren't swayed greatly by the voices of the fans.


Judoka is offline  
post #4 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-10-2009, 04:41 AM
BEWARE OF THE PENGUIN!
 
No_Mercy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,131
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Sparkle View Post
In short - fans win (we get the fights we want), fighters lose (money and bargaining ability).

What I am getting at is when the UFC bought Pride, I think we all thought, finally, the best will be fighting the best. Now with Strikeforce/Affliction, etc, there is a division again and if fighters are not happy in one place they hop to another. I hope and pray that we do not get into a boxing scenario with an alphabet soup of champions.

Are we living in the dwindling golden age of MMA? Will the fights we really want to see never happen, or happen well past their best before date. What is the solution to this? Could there be an over site committee ensuring the best fighters meeting in a timely fashion? Is it possible?

I truly feel that something needs to be done fast to keep each new association that pops up from veering off the path and claiming that they have the true champion in each division.

Thoughts?
This is a great topic. The divisions are over. Strikeforce may be around for a while. UFC will unify the MMA scene sooner than later. Dream should be the counterpart overseas as it really doesn't pose too big of a challenge. However in most business there is a one and two. IBM (hardware) vs Microsoft (software) at one point, Coca Cola vs Pepsi which is probably a better example, McDonalds vs every other fast food franchise. Clearly the UFC is at the top. Unlike his predecessors (Elite/Bodog) Scott Coker has a solid reputation within MMA circles as a promoter and business man that's why his organization has flourished. They stayed out of the behemoth's way up until now...

For those of you who don't know why they made a move to CBS for a paltry deal. It's for them to garner larger sponsors. The UFC has a substantial following therefore they run PPVs which they keep the profits and do free shows at will. CBS reaches a wider demographic, but not sure it's a good idea allowing kids to watch this even though I did back in the 90's...lolz! Plus there's no revenue.

Wages will be a lot higher with the UFC. It's already becoming the NBA or NFL of MMA with major sponsors. First they need to get New York and key states then get it sanctioned in the Olympics. Crazy thing is this sport is going to create a Spartan like army of our generation.

Wonder how it's going to be like in another 10-20+ years.

Last edited by No_Mercy; 11-10-2009 at 04:55 AM.
No_Mercy is offline  
post #5 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-10-2009, 04:57 AM
Light Heavyweight
 
Biowza's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,474
Blog Entries: 1
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judoka View Post
Fans win? In a monopoly, we have the stfu and follow the UFC, they have the power as the big number 1, they do listen to the fans obviously but aren't swayed greatly by the voices of the fans.
We aren't tied down and forced to watch MMA. The UFC will put on quality fights because that's how they make their money...through the fans.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdun11
This is by far the easiest and safest pick of the year in mma.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdun11
Nog's only chance is one of his miracle submissions, after taking a beating the entire fight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdun11
But its not gay if you watch it with a hot chik.
Biowza is offline  
post #6 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-10-2009, 05:08 AM
BEWARE OF THE PENGUIN!
 
No_Mercy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,131
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biowza View Post
We aren't tied down and forced to watch MMA. The UFC will put on quality fights because that's how they make their money...through the fans.
Yah it all falls on the management. If you had Elite it would be like boxing; corrupt. Those guys were terrible for the sport. The UFC has the right business model.

Think it's an interesting point to have second tiered organizations to give B class fighters a platform to perform and secondly for A class fighters to negotiate. Then we have the situation with Hendo, Mousasi, and Fedor now. Perhaps it would be inevitable to have ONE organization then there's no options. That's when we the fans win I suppose.
No_Mercy is offline  
post #7 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-10-2009, 06:02 AM
Super Heavyweight
 
Judoka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,379
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biowza View Post
We aren't tied down and forced to watch MMA. The UFC will put on quality fights because that's how they make their money...through the fans.
True but if we want to watch MMA then UFC is the most obviously to the general fan as it is the biggest most well known.

Of course they have to put on quality fights but as a monoply it means they can do what they want rather then what the fans want more but obviously they are not going to want to put on boring fights because they can.


Judoka is offline  
post #8 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-10-2009, 06:54 AM
The Detective
 
diablo5597's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
                     
I like it as a monopoly. I want all the best fighters in 1 organization. I don't like that Henderson might leave and Fedor is in Strikeforce. Imagine if in the NFL the AFC and NFC were separate. That would suck.
diablo5597 is offline  
post #9 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-10-2009, 08:34 AM
Lightweight
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,883
                     
Competition is important in the beginning of a sport for incentive and to ensure fair pay/treatment of fighters. After a sport has been well established it is better off to see one league (or in this case promotion) take over so that all the best competitors are under one roof. All the major North American sports have followed this pattern. No one complains about there being no competition for the NFL. The key is that there was competition at one time.

MMA is still in its infancy as a sport (less than 20 years, that is nothing) so it is still shaking things out. Ultimately I hope we'll see just one organization so that there are no issues with getting the best to fight each other. Whether it is the UFC or not doesn't matter, although they have a big head start.
Drogo is offline  
post #10 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-10-2009, 08:55 AM
-DayDay Knucks-
 
HitOrGetHit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 20,138
Blog Entries: 13
                     
The NFL, NBA, and NHL are all monopolized. The MLS is one association. All of the major organizations are ran by one group. It works out great for them, I don't see why it wouldn't with the UFC.


-Always Supporting-
Miesha Tate - Urijah Faber - Dustin Poirier - Frankie Edgar - Claudia Gadelha - Tecia Torres - Demian Maia - Jessica Eye - Diaz Bro's

Sig Credit: M.C
HitOrGetHit is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome