I agree round two went to Tito and three to Forest but I dont see how you could justify a 10-8 third round, its not like Forest did something in the third round to out class or hurt Tito, Tito just gassed out and was so tired he didn't have the arms to throw a punch. Griffin was a class act in the interview after the fight, hell he even stuck up for Tito I like that.
Had the third round been competitive I think this thread would have a lot more opinions and spark a lot more debate with the community here. It would also gain a lot more validity.
Just to play Devil's advocate, go back and score each round. If you gave the first round to Tito then you IMO should have Tito winning the fight.
This is one of the issues with three rounds of fighting, I think we all know had this been a five round fight Tito would have been stopped one way or the other but because its a three round fight you can make a case that he did in fact out point forest if you feel he took the first round.
The 10 point must system becomes more flawed in mma the less rounds you have to apply it.
I laughed when Goldberg said you can never question Tito's conditioning when clearly for whatever reason you want to attribute it to, his conditioning was a huge factor in the last round and the poorest Ive ever seen out of him. After all this time Goldie proves he can still comfortably fit his shoe in his mouth with no problems whatsoever.... LOL.