Who was "robbed" in the Ortiz/Griffin fight (spoilers) - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 41 (permalink) Old 11-23-2009, 10:16 AM Thread Starter
Josh Jones III's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 153
Who was "robbed" in the Ortiz/Griffin fight (spoilers)

Apparently, Tito claims he was "robbed" in Saturday's fight.

Um, I'm sorry, but was he talking about a different fight? Yeah, he got some takedowns and landed a few elbows, but the majority of that fight consisted of Tito getting his face tenderized and blocking 0.0 per cent of punches thrown at him.

Am I missing something here? Should I rewatch the fight? I'm amazed it was even a split decision. Should've been unanimous 29-28 Griffin.
Josh Jones III is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 41 (permalink) Old 11-23-2009, 10:24 AM
official thrash metal connoisseur
hellholming's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,244
Griffin won 29-28... The only round Tito won was round 2. Had Forrest knocked down Tito in the third it would have been a sure 10-8. Right now if I could I'd score that round 10-8½.

sigpic by Toxic

Fedor, Mir, Lytle, Serra, Hendo, Chuck, Minowaman, Maynard, Forrest, Hunt
Pickett, Cerrone, Matt Brown, Bisping, Weidman, Barnett, Lawler

hellholming is offline  
post #3 of 41 (permalink) Old 11-23-2009, 10:31 AM
Hawndo's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 2,139
Whilst watching it, haven't had time to watch it again, but I had it;
Ortiz Forest
1 10 - 9
2 10 - 9
3 8 - 10
28 - 28

But there was one round I think could of went either way but can't remember which one, might have been round 2. I really do't see where the 30-27 comes from though.
Hawndo is offline  
post #4 of 41 (permalink) Old 11-23-2009, 10:37 AM
Freelancer's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,658
It could have been a draw very easily, but I don't think Tito did enough to win.

"He who defeats himself is the mightiest warrior" - Confucius(I think)
Freelancer is offline  
post #5 of 41 (permalink) Old 11-23-2009, 10:39 AM
MMA Fanatic
Ace962's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 9
Forrest definately won the fight, I can't believe it's even a discussion or that it wasa split decision. Forrest won the first round, Tito won the second, and Forrest dominate the third. Forrest dominated the striking, and for the most part dominated octagon control. He got taken down twice, but Tito never did anything with it (aside from a cut) and in fact, Forrest looked better escaping from one of the takedowns than Tito did actually achieving the takedown. And the last round was very close to being 10-8.

I had the fight scored 29-28 Forrest, very close to 29-27.

Top 5:
1. Rich Franklin
2. Brock Lesnar
3. Urijah Faber
4. Jose Aldo
5. Gabriel Gonzaga
Ace962 is offline  
post #6 of 41 (permalink) Old 11-23-2009, 10:47 AM
Xerxes's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,224
The only reason why we COULD make a case for Tito winning the fight is because we have a flawed scoring system and judging criteria.

Tito really lost that fight clearly.
Xerxes is offline  
post #7 of 41 (permalink) Old 11-23-2009, 11:12 AM
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,859
It was a close fight. I don't think it was a no brainer that Griffen won the fight. I scored it 29-28 for Forrest but round 1 was REALLY close. You could have given it to Tito and since Tito won round 2 in most people's opinion then a 29-28 for Tito isn't unreasonable. Round 3 was the only round in the fight that was undisputable.

People always seem to assume that if there are two close rounds that they split them. They don't, you can have a razor close fight be scored 30-27 for fighter A by one judge and 30-27 for fighter B by another if they have 3 really close rounds and the judge just happens to give all 3 of them to one fighter.
Drogo is offline  
post #8 of 41 (permalink) Old 11-23-2009, 11:24 AM
Big Dawg
Ruckus's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bethlehem, PA
Posts: 911
I was hoping to rewatch the fight this morning but the damn DVR didn't record so I am SOL. Going on pure memory. WIth the scoring system as is, I have to say that I can understand a 30-27 score for Griffin. Octagon control was fairly even in the first two rounds and all Griffin in the third. Agression was equal in the first two rounds as well, and again the third was all Forrest. Ortiz shot twice in the first round, successful on the first which Forrest was able to escape via a kimora, which also happens to be a submission attempt. Tito also had a couple of take downs in the second round, which Griffin for the most part was able to either weather the storm and regain control by getting to his feet or flat out nulify the GnP from Tito by getting into a close guard. Aside from some scar tissue being opened wide by a vicious elbow, Griffin didn't take much damage from his back in the second round, the blood was flowing but I don't think he was hurt too bad. In this round Griffen landed slightly more strikes, so depending on how much you weigh in the takedowns,gives this round a toss up for either fighter, could have easily gone either way, perhaps even a 10-10 round. The third round is self explainatory, I think Ortiz might have had about 6 or 7 strikes while Griffin never stopped striking probably having close to 45 or so. I scored it 10-9, 9-10 and 10-8 at the time of the fight, Griffin wins 29-27.

Ruckus is offline  
post #9 of 41 (permalink) Old 11-23-2009, 11:40 AM
bmo37's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 116
I've been a Tito fan for a long time, and I honestly don't think he won that fight, the 3rd round he was non-existent. From what I saw Tito came out strong than faded in rounds 2-3 and during those rounds Forrest landed some good shots consistently. And it's been said a million times, if you don't want to go to a decision than knock your opponent out.
bmo37 is offline  
post #10 of 41 (permalink) Old 11-23-2009, 11:49 AM
Super Heavyweight
AlphaDawg's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,052
I personally had it at a draw. The only round that could have gone either way was round 1. Round 2 belonged to Tito and round 3 went to Griffin.



It was a matter of which way you went in Round 1. Either Tito should have won or it should of been a draw. Tito shouldn't have been an absolute tool in round 3 and he could have easily won.
AlphaDawg is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome