Originally Posted by jmacjer

Well no, it was the other way around. Unless you only count head shots as damaging blows. GSP out-struck BJ in all 3 rounds. As far as percentage of shots landed BJ edged out GSP so you could very well argue he was the more technically sound striker that night.

The second fight was a blowout, with GSP landing a very high percentage of strikes thrown. I would say GSP was more technical that fight.

As for JimmyJames. How can you not rank Anderson as a technical striker?

Originally Posted by jmacjer

Well no, it was the other way around. Unless you only count head shots as damaging blows. GSP out-struck BJ in all 3 rounds. As far as percentage of shots landed BJ edged out GSP so you could very well argue he was the more technically sound striker that night.

The second fight was a blowout, with GSP landing a very high percentage of strikes thrown. I would say GSP was more technical that fight.

As for JimmyJames. How can you not rank Anderson as a technical striker?

Originally Posted by khoveraki

Typo, my bad, I meant GSP outstruck BJ. I think BJ landed like 40 shots all night and GSP landed nearly 300.

Originally Posted by TraMaI

Wouldn't say GSP is the best striker, he's definitely up there don't get me wrong, but he's also contending againts the likes of Martin Kampmann, Daley (who is a damn good striker, just not "THE MOST TECHNICAL STRIKER IN MMA OMFG") and Thiago Alves, all of whom I'd rank over GSP in the striking department. Now, GSP does quite possibly have the most well rounded game in MMA which makes all of his skills seem like they're god like, where as strikers like Daley, Kamp and Alves have to worry about the takedown etc.