so for rampage vs forest, rampage was considered the underdog by ODDS MAKERS?? I am not talking about "champ vs challenger" so much as odds makers decision. For example, odds makers still had machida as the favorite and evans as their underdog, so if their fight went to a decision (and for arugments sake lets say it was a close match), would the judges favor machida or evans or would there not be any favoritism. I guess a crap example would be vanderlei vs lidell. Anyone (besides helen keller and others in her circumstanses)knows that lidell didn't win ALL three rounds. However one judge gave him all three rounds. Keep in mind lidell was the favorite by odds makers.