Compustrike for ufc 112 co main event - Page 2 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 30 (permalink) Old 04-12-2010, 10:13 PM Thread Starter
Amatuer
 
Kang-War's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 110
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeHawk View Post
Please do show me where there have been corrupt judges in the UFC. I'm very interested to see your proof.
Gsp vs bj penn 1 ( just guessed tlc awnser)
Kang-War is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 30 (permalink) Old 04-12-2010, 10:16 PM
TLC
Bantamweight
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 703
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kang-War View Post
im pretty sure that people that judge for a living are more qualify then us. Probably when u watch it live ring side in the best seat of the house make a deference in a point of view. no offence to established members lol. Im not a big fan of octagon control (randy couture holding u tight on the fence thing) but edgar was very active in the octagon compare to a rarely flat footed bj penn. Look like judge count that
Again, if you count that as scoring than you are incompetent and inept. Moving around =/= points. If so, Kalib Starnes beat Quarry by 10-8 score in the final round of that fight.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeHawk View Post
Please do show me where there have been corrupt judges in the UFC. I'm very interested to see your proof.

Corrupt judging is never proven, even when it is obvious. (Jones vs the Korean, in Seoul, for example. Eugenia Williams, another)

So that's a weak answer to be honest. It's quite obvious that the UFC has had some VERY suspicious scoring over the past year.
TLC is offline  
post #13 of 30 (permalink) Old 04-12-2010, 10:17 PM
"I <3 Trolls"
 
TraMaI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,923
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLC View Post
The stats prove just what everyone believed. Penn won 48-47. Also those stats fail because they actually called that a takedown in round 3. That was not a completed takedown. What is this amateur hour?

Not to mention BJ landed the harder shots all night.
Wait, BJ won it 48-47? How did he win the 3rd? He was out struck in the 4th and 5th and in the third Frankie landed 40% of his shots (the strikes were even in landing) and he was much more mobile while BJ looked to be accumulating damage.





Also, I would like to add to this thread that I've always thought Fight Metric is garbage. A ~30 strike disparity between the two is MASSIVE.
TraMaI is offline  
post #14 of 30 (permalink) Old 04-12-2010, 10:19 PM
Lightweight
 
MikeHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,883
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLC View Post
Again, if you count that as scoring than you are incompetent and inept. Moving around =/= points. If so, Kalib Starnes beat Quarry by 10-8 score in the final round of that fight.




Corrupt judging is never proven, even when it is obvious. (Jones vs the Korean, in Seoul, for example. Eugenia Williams, another)

So that's a weak answer to be honest. It's quite obvious that the UFC has had some VERY suspicious scoring over the past year.
If you're going to compare what Starnes did to what Edgar did then you have no business debating.

Right, it's never been proven but you magically know it's there. Well good for you. Go live in your own little world with your conspiracy theories.
MikeHawk is offline  
post #15 of 30 (permalink) Old 04-12-2010, 10:21 PM
TLC
Bantamweight
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 703
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by TraMaI View Post
Wait, BJ won it 48-47? How did he win the 3rd? He was out struck in the 4th and 5th and in the third Frankie landed 40% of his shots (the strikes were even in landing) and he was much more mobile while BJ looked to be accumulating damage.





Also, I would like to add to this thread that I've always thought Fight Metric is garbage. A ~30 strike disparity between the two is MASSIVE.

Power punches >>>>>> jabs.

Also it's just my opinion, but power punches to face > leg kicks
TLC is offline  
post #16 of 30 (permalink) Old 04-12-2010, 10:23 PM
TLC
Bantamweight
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 703
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeHawk View Post
If you're going to compare what Starnes did to what Edgar did then you have no business debating.

Right, it's never been proven but you magically know it's there. Well good for you. Go live in your own little world with your conspiracy theories.
You just stated that Edgar won a round by movement. Circling an opponent is just as valuable as what Starnes did. I'm pretty sure I have more business debating than a guy who thinks moving around the octagon scores points.

No that's actually called having eyes, and not being retarded and/or intoxicated.

50-45 is corrupt by any means for EITHER fighter.
48-47 Machida screams corrupt.
Hammill losing to Bisping, CORRUPT.

I don't settle for incompetence as an excuse when a 6 year old could've made a better call.

Last edited by TLC; 04-12-2010 at 10:25 PM.
TLC is offline  
post #17 of 30 (permalink) Old 04-12-2010, 10:24 PM
Amatuer
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: philadelphia, pa
Posts: 112
                     
If you look at the fight round by round, it seems as if the fight was a draw. BJ outstruck Frankie the first 2 rounds and the 3rd was even. The last 2 rounds went to Frankie. If you look at the overall fight, it does seem as if Frankie won by a slim margin.
cisco2403 is offline  
post #18 of 30 (permalink) Old 04-12-2010, 10:30 PM
TLC
Bantamweight
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 703
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by cisco2403 View Post
If you look at the fight round by round, it seems as if the fight was a draw. BJ outstruck Frankie the first 2 rounds and the 3rd was even. The last 2 rounds went to Frankie. If you look at the overall fight, it does seem as if Frankie won by a slim margin.
I would've been fine with a draw. I would've been okay with a split decision win for Edgar, with the scores being around the 48-47 range. But the scores were all over the place, and just reeked of a foul fish stench.

Also just throwing this out here.

Sherdog
----
Jordan Breen scores the round 10-9 Edgar (49-47 Penn)
Greg Savage scores the round 10-9 Edgar (48-47 Penn)
Mike Fridley scores the round 10-9 Edgar (49-46 Penn)


MMAfighting
----

Tough fight overall to call. Final round for Edgar. I have it 48-47 for Penn, but easily could have gone either way.

Fightmetric
---
49-47 Penn

CBS
---
Danny Burkholder- Penn with a right hand and a knee to the body at the end of the round. 10-9 Edgar, so I would judge the fight for Penn, 49-46. We'll see what the real judges think.

ESPN
----
Jordan Breen scores the round 10-9 Penn (49-47 Penn) Greg Savage scores the round 10-9 Edgar (48-47 Penn) Mike Fridley scores the round 10-9 Edgar (49-46 Penn)

These are ALL the RBR's I saw within the first 10 or so pages on google. I didn't leave any out to support my argument, although I'm not really looking beyond that because doing a search on "Penn vs Edgar round by round" generates a shitload of sites with the "This site may harm your computer" tag underneath it for some reason.

Last edited by TLC; 04-12-2010 at 10:35 PM.
TLC is offline  
post #19 of 30 (permalink) Old 04-12-2010, 10:33 PM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 92
                     
Really close fight.

My observations were that BJ wasn't shocked at the decision and even went over to congratulate him and Frankie was pretty confident he won at the end of the 5th.

I'd like to see a rematch. BJ will need to mix it up more and not just rely on his striking. Frankie is just too fast and it definitely discouraged BJ.
Rationalist is offline  
post #20 of 30 (permalink) Old 04-12-2010, 10:55 PM
-NOW YOU SLEEP-

 
_RIVAL_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cal-State South Annex
Posts: 10,910
                     
I've watched this fight over and over.... B.J. won it hands down IMO.. there were rounds when Frankie landed damn near nothing and B.J. was jabbing his little face off and countering with hooks....

This fight wasn't even as close as Shogun-Machida IMO..


----> WWW.MMAFORUM.COM <----



_RIVALS TOP 10

ANDERSON "THE SPIDER" SILVA
JAKE SHIELDS
NICK DIAZ
EDDIE ALVAREZ
JUNIOR "CIGANO" DOS SANTOS
GILBERT MELENDEZ
MAMED "THE CANNIBAL" KHALIDOV
HECTOR "SHANGO" LOMBARD
CAIN VELASQUEZ
GEGARD "THE DREAM CATCHER" MOUSASI
_RIVAL_ is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome