I don't realy agree with these Rankings.
I think some fighters are placed too high and some are too low.
- too high: Miller, Guida, Dunham, Noons
- too low: Benson, Henderson, Josh Thomson, Alvarez (i have him above Griffin any day)
I don't get it: how is Huerta 27?? And Guida 17. And Huerta beat Guida, even though this fight is from 2007. Before he left the UFC he was in the TOP 10 (even top6 in my books, his only losses in the UFC to Florian and a split decision to Maynard). I just don't get that. Guida is entertaining, but he is WAY too high on these rankings imo.
I just think there are just too many UFC fighters in that top. It's a shame no match-ups between most of these fighters are possible at this moment...
OK, let's compare numbers for Guida and Huerta in details.
Rank - CurrScore - AllTime - 2year - RecentScore - Last4Fgt - last Fight
18 - 513.3 - 177.1 - 179 - 71.42 - 84.7 - 31 - Clay Guida
27 - 469.4 - 187.6 - 141 - 57.78 - 81.7 - 27 - Roger Huerta
So, yes Huerta has a better All Time score (187 > 177), but his other scores are not as good as Guida's.
2 year score (last 1000 days) score is Guida 179, Huerta 141.
Last fight for Guida has score of 31 and Huerta 27.
All Time score is what is career rating of a fighter
, but Current Score it heavily time dependent. If somebody is not active enough score will be lover. Also, recent fights worth more.