Melvin is not that great, again he's got speed and power but its like mickey mouse wielding he-man's sword. Nate was able to stand with him and started to really turn it on.
Let me be more clear I didn't say he should stand and trade but he can and IMO should win the stand up by fighting smart.
Melvin is not only a underachiever your overrating him as well. Dose he have a KO/tko to be proud of? You know, a win thats says hay not only can I KO scrubs but I can KO competitors like maybe a top ten guy? The answer is no he doesn't and I dont think he'll get that win against Dunham.
Im not sure why someone like Dennis Silver, a nobody who's beaten nobody and been beaten by more than one nobody, how can he be used as a measuring stick for anything?
I like Melvin he always looks like he's right on the edge of putting the pieces together but has never once delivered when I thought he could have and Jackson probably wont be able to change anything enough to matter.
This is a ridiculous statement. Way to avoid the question as well. Guillard has double digit kos, including several in the UFC, include punches and knees to the body, one punch KOs. He also outpointed Jeremy Stephens, a fighter known almost exclusively for striking ability, and KO'd Siver, another big striker. Second of all, I recommend contacts, as glasses are becoming out of style if you think Diaz was winning that fight before Melvin dove into a guillotine. He completely was outclassing Diaz, Diaz only has a sturdy chin to thank for not being knocked out.
Dunham has stopped two nobodies who will never get anywhere near the Octagon for the rest of their lives unless they buy a ticket, and busted up an old ass non-striker in Sherk coming off a huge layoff and apparently now he's Manny Pacquiao.
Furthermore, your logic is so poor it makes my brain hurt. Top 10 ranking =/= Ability.
This is like saying Brock Lesnar can outstrike JDS because JDS has only struck guys outside of the top 10, like Yvel and Cro Cop.
But Lesnar KO'd Couture! And he was the champ!