Originally Posted by Canadian Psycho
There's really no sense in going back and forth with you after reading that, as you've clearly demonstrated your bias. That bias and your being a condescending prick aside, Nate did plenty of shit, including whooping Kim on the feet in the third. But again, there's simply no point in discussing it further with you. Not worth the effort.
Rory Markham and Marcus Davis say 'hello'. Even Kim was sporting a cut. Can't bruise a banana, but can TKO and/or lacerate a human being. I don't think Nate's hands are an issue. He and his brother may not have the punching power of a prime Chuck Liddell, but I don't see how anyone could refer to their striking as girlish when the punches clearly do damage. Not picking a fight with you, but simply disagreeing, respectfully of course.
Bias. Says the guy with Nate Diaz in his avatar. Yes, it is I who is biased. Me, sherdog, mmajunkie, the three judges, Dana White, Joe Rogan, and just about 70 percent of the fans are biased to think that Nate Diaz did shit in the fight except get outgrappled badly.
Yes he outstruck Kim in the 3rd, fight is 3 rounds. 2 > 1.
The only thing I would really like to see changed in the scoring is TDD if a guy shoots for a take down and you stuff it you get the points he would have for taking you down. It would help stop the constant spamming of takedowns. Also failing to improve position or trying to improve position should be an auto stand up with the takedown points voided.
I have no problem with people utilising wrestling in their game, it's mma they are entitled to use what they want. I do however have a problem with someone leg humping another guy for 3/5 rounds.
Nonsense. That's like saying if you block a huge haymaker you should be awarded the points the guy would've scored by clocking you and likely dropping you to the floor.
In MMA you are rewarded for offense, not defense.