Take down defense - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 26 (permalink) Old 03-04-2011, 05:10 PM Thread Starter
MMA Fanatic
 
TomMMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 34
                     
Take down defense

At what point does Takedown Defense score for you? Is it part of octagon control? Is it worth nothing other than you are choosing where the fight takes place? To me it seems like at some point it should count for something.

The Diego/Kampmann fight is a perfect example. Diego goes 1 for 15 on takedowns and it is quite possibly that one takedown that gives him the edge in the fight. It just seems a bit wrong to me. Does anyone know/have any input?

Supporting Fighters:

Dan Hardy - Quinton Jackson - Nick Diaz - Paul Daley - Carlos Condit - Urijah Faber - Joe Lauzon - Lyoto Machida - Antonio Rogerio Nogueira - B.J. Penn - Kazushi Sakuraba - Anderson Silva - George Sotiropoulos - Mauricio Rua
TomMMA is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 26 (permalink) Old 03-04-2011, 05:27 PM
Psychedelic
 
Inkdot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 891
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomMMA View Post
At what point does Takedown Defense score for you? Is it part of octagon control? Is it worth nothing other than you are choosing where the fight takes place? To me it seems like at some point it should count for something.

The Diego/Kampmann fight is a perfect example. Diego goes 1 for 15 on takedowns and it is quite possibly that one takedown that gives him the edge in the fight. It just seems a bit wrong to me. Does anyone know/have any input?
I think, strictly speaking, according to the rules it counts as octagon control but no judges implement this for some strange reason. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong (and if possible provide a reference to prove it).
Inkdot is offline  
post #3 of 26 (permalink) Old 03-04-2011, 05:47 PM
ROCKET FISTS
 
khoveraki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,743
                     
I agree, take-down defense is a ridiculously undervalued skill in MMA scoring.



In a cage, it's much much harder to stuff a take-down than it is to complete one. Even if you can't shoot a fast double you can always drive them against the cage and get it from there.



I think judges confuse the cage pummeling with Randy Couture style clinch fighting. Let's say in JDS vs. Nelson, Nelson went for a takedown quite a few times and the couple of times Cigano couldn't shuck him off quick, Nelson had him temporarily pressed against the cage.


In pummeling, JDS was winning that exchange because he was stuffing the takedown. But from the judges perspective, Nelson was holding him against the cage, therefor "octagon control."



We need some judges who understand wrestling.

WAR CIGANO



sig credit to Limba

lobster train.
khoveraki is offline  
post #4 of 26 (permalink) Old 03-04-2011, 05:50 PM
 
Toxic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: See that guy over in the window, with the binoculars?
Posts: 21,821
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by khoveraki View Post
I agree, take-down defense is a ridiculously undervalued skill in MMA scoring.



In a cage, it's much much harder to stuff a take-down than it is to complete one. Even if you can't shoot a fast double you can always drive them against the cage and get it from there.



I think judges confuse the cage pummeling with Randy Couture style clinch fighting. Let's say in JDS vs. Nelson, Nelson went for a takedown quite a few times and the couple of times Cigano couldn't shuck him off quick, Nelson had him temporarily pressed against the cage.


In pummeling, JDS was winning that exchange because he was stuffing the takedown. But from the judges perspective, Nelson was holding him against the cage, therefor "octagon control."



We need some judges who understand wrestling.
This, it does count under the current system its some judges and fans who do not understand what is going on that is the problem.




"If you get hit and it hurts hit him back you not knocked out yet."-Joe Doerksen
The Toxic Terrors (FFL)
Demetrious Johnson*Eduardo Dantas*Emanuel Newton*Will Brooks*Michael Page



Toxic is offline  
post #5 of 26 (permalink) Old 03-04-2011, 05:51 PM
Psychedelic
 
Inkdot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 891
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by khoveraki View Post
We need some judges who understand wrestling.
Yes for sure!

And we need to change the judges mindset that agression=winning. Alot of fighters rely more on technical counter striking and those guys are at risk of loosing fights even if they were more effective.
Inkdot is offline  
post #6 of 26 (permalink) Old 03-04-2011, 05:53 PM
Featherweight
 
dario03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,001
                     
I wouldn't give points for stopping a takedown. I also wouldn't score points for blocking strikes. I would give points for getting a takedown and landing strikes. If you can stop your opponent from getting a takedown or landing strikes then you have stopped them from getting points but haven't got yourself closer to winning (well besides making them waste energy).

The Reigning, Defending, Undisputed MMAFNPFFL Grand Master Champion of The Universe!!!
dario03 is offline  
post #7 of 26 (permalink) Old 03-04-2011, 05:57 PM
Psychedelic
 
Inkdot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 891
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by dario03 View Post
I wouldn't give points for stopping a takedown. I also wouldn't score points for blocking strikes. I would give points for getting a takedown and landing strikes. If you can stop your opponent from getting a takedown or landing strikes then you have stopped them from getting points but haven't got yourself closer to winning (well besides making them waste energy).
Octagon control = controlling where the fight takes place and or it's pace.

A guy scored a TD = octagon control

When Diego shoots a double leg at Kampmann he thinks "I want to take this fight to the ground", when Kampmann stuffs that takedown he thinks "I wanna keep standing". If the result is that they keep standing then it's octagon control and should score.

However most judges don't realise that octagon control is pretty far down the priotity list and should only be considered when everything else (effective striking, grapping and aggression) are about equal or atleast sorta cancels out overall.

I realise that judging fights in an objective way is truly difficult but I'm sure it's possible to get some better judges! The last couple of months have been horrible, especially in Australia.
Inkdot is offline  
post #8 of 26 (permalink) Old 03-04-2011, 06:13 PM
Bantamweight
 
ESPADA9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Temecula, California
Posts: 925
                     
I donít see how a DEFENSIVE move scores points but you canít give points to a fighter who gets 90% of their takedowns negated by superior TDD only to get a feeble takedown in later rounds doing no real damage and not attempting to advance position.

I agree with InkDot that the fighters who stuffs the majority of the takedowns and doesnít sustain any damage from the few takedowns that are successful should be considered to have octagon control.

Placing so much of the fight score on takedowns that fail to result in ANY damage, no sub attempts and no attempt to advance position end up turning MMA into a tackling contest.

At least posture up and throw something or TRY and pass guard.

Kampmannís TDD impressed me far more than Diegoís grappling ability.
ESPADA9 is offline  
post #9 of 26 (permalink) Old 03-04-2011, 06:15 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 336
                     
Stuffing TDs = octagon control, its in the unified rules.

also, Kampmann not only stuffed a boatload of TDs, he made Diego pay for them with knees, punches and elbows so really he was scoring in 2 ways. Controlling the octagon ands scoring points via strikes. He laid some well timed knees more than a few times from failed TDs.
SonOfZion is offline  
post #10 of 26 (permalink) Old 03-04-2011, 06:19 PM
Welterweight
 
Sambo de Amigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Land of Truth
Posts: 2,311
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by khoveraki View Post
I agree, take-down defense is a ridiculously undervalued skill in MMA scoring.



In a cage, it's much much harder to stuff a take-down than it is to complete one. Even if you can't shoot a fast double you can always drive them against the cage and get it from there.



I think judges confuse the cage pummeling with Randy Couture style clinch fighting. Let's say in JDS vs. Nelson, Nelson went for a takedown quite a few times and the couple of times Cigano couldn't shuck him off quick, Nelson had him temporarily pressed against the cage.


In pummeling, JDS was winning that exchange because he was stuffing the takedown. But from the judges perspective, Nelson was holding him against the cage, therefor "octagon control."



We need some judges who understand wrestling.

Can i ask how in a cage is it harder stuff a takedown ? when you have the Cage to lean against and plant your feet i know you can be held there but the actually completing of a takedown while against a cage is extremely hard.

Bisping Fan extraordinaire

Velasquez will be back

Sambo de Amigo is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome