Revolving title = Excitment and intrigue - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-06-2011, 03:41 AM Thread Starter
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 53
                     
Revolving title = Excitment and intrigue

People talk it up as a bad thing...
I think the revolving title makes for an exciting division means the competition is alive and healthy. For example...

Rampage
Rashad
Machida
Forrest
Couture
Tito (on the way out)
Shogun

All former(1 current) champions all who have an equal chance of getting it again. Add then the contenders...

Jones
T.Silva
Franklin(add former champ in diff div)
Bader
Davis
Gustaffson(will be a jet)
Hammill

Granted it does fall away quickly, but geez its any bodies game.

Then the issue over at LW where everyone is a contender cause of all the rematches stagnating the title shots.

Who doesn't love that??
Cragly is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-06-2011, 04:05 AM
of Nazareth
 
Soojooko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Moon
Posts: 9,657
                     
I love both. I love revolving belts. I love dominant champions.

The thing with dominant champs is the value they add to the belt. Winning a belt that has swapped hands for 5 years will never carry the same weight as taking it from a champion that has held it for 5 years. In closing, revolving belts are good for the fans and the entertainment value. But as far as pure sporting reasons are concerned, a dominant champ is a very healthy thing.
Soojooko is offline  
post #3 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-06-2011, 07:08 AM
Flyweight
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 324
                     
Shogun is keeping the belt for a while.

I don't see anyone at 205 that can beat him, he's ahead of the pack by quite a bit. Davis seems to be the biggest threat with his strength but I don't think he could keep Shogun down long enough to win.

Always rooting for: Bisping, Shogun, Jon Jones, Daley, Hardy, Sonnen, Fedor, Couture, Jacare.
EliteUndisputed is offline  
post #4 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-06-2011, 10:25 AM
Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,705
                     
I think a champion who holds his belt is more exciting to watch. You alawys end up watching it to see if that said person will finally lose or if he will be able to win in a dominant fashion.

Thats not to say that the LHW division is boring.
Spec0688 is offline  
post #5 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-06-2011, 11:10 AM
Welterweight
 
BrianRClover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Saint Louis MO
Posts: 2,384
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soojooko View Post
I love both. I love revolving belts. I love dominant champions.

The thing with dominant champs is the value they add to the belt. Winning a belt that has swapped hands for 5 years will never carry the same weight as taking it from a champion that has held it for 5 years. In closing, revolving belts are good for the fans and the entertainment value. But as far as pure sporting reasons are concerned, a dominant champ is a very healthy thing.
What he said.
BrianRClover is offline  
post #6 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-06-2011, 02:03 PM
Bantamweight
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 864
                     
I think revolving belts are just a sign of how close the competition is.

I love dominant champs to, Anderson Silva is no doubt an amazing MMA figurehead and I may not like GSP but I do respect him. I just personally don't think the WW and MW divisions are quite as deep and close as LW, LHW and HW. Not to take anything away from the defending champs, but is anyone surprised that it's those 2 divisions with dominant champs at the moment?
sNuFf_rEaLiTy is offline  
post #7 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-06-2011, 02:30 PM
Colossal-weight
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,202
                     
Need both. Few dominant champs annd a few divisions that are up for grabs.
jonnyg4508 is offline  
post #8 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-06-2011, 10:15 PM
Lightweight
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,651
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by sNuFf_rEaLiTy View Post
I think revolving belts are just a sign of how close the competition is.

I love dominant champs to, Anderson Silva is no doubt an amazing MMA figurehead and I may not like GSP but I do respect him. I just personally don't think the WW and MW divisions are quite as deep and close as LW, LHW and HW. Not to take anything away from the defending champs, but is anyone surprised that it's those 2 divisions with dominant champs at the moment?
BS... the other divisions are the ones who lack true elite of the elite fighters IMO

shogun could be one if it wasnt for his knee..or maybe JBJ will be one

i dont think its fun when the belt is like hot potato, because that just means that the vitory wasnt that impressive, its not impressive to be champ and lose it in your next fight, the LHW belt is in need of a dominant champ to bring that value back

BJ made the LW belt matter, and frankie is keeping it strong for now

the FW belt matters, WW belt, MW belt...but the LHW belt? who cares whos champ, by the next defense we will have a new one, its a fun division because of the fighters, but lacking a dominant champ kinda takes away the meaning of being a champ

theres that saying that you're only truly a champion once you defend your belt..
ACTAFOOL is offline  
post #9 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-07-2011, 03:53 AM
KO artist
 
Liddellianenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,335
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACTAFOOL View Post
BS... the other divisions are the ones who lack true elite of the elite fighters IMO

shogun could be one if it wasnt for his knee..or maybe JBJ will be one

i dont think its fun when the belt is like hot potato, because that just means that the vitory wasnt that impressive, its not impressive to be champ and lose it in your next fight, the LHW belt is in need of a dominant champ to bring that value back

BJ made the LW belt matter, and frankie is keeping it strong for now

the FW belt matters, WW belt, MW belt...but the LHW belt? who cares whos champ, by the next defense we will have a new one, its a fun division because of the fighters, but lacking a dominant champ kinda takes away the meaning of being a champ

theres that saying that you're only truly a champion once you defend your belt..
This. You can tell how "deep" the LHW division is when the champ from a lower weight class DESTROYS the guy who held the belt 8 months back and makes him run crying from the octagon without landing so much as a punch. I know it's Anderson, but if the division were so stacked it's ex champs with their weight advantage could offer much tougher fights.

IMO the only exceptional fighters in the LHW division are Jones and Davis. The rest only look good because contrary to perception their competition in the LHW division is actually quite weak, with mostly poor technique brawlers and LnP wrestlers (except the two I mentioned).

Same with LW. Weak champs in a weak division that only looks great because all the guys are basically elitish mid-tiers. This is why their champ can't just climb up and destroy ex-champs and contenders in the other divs. Heck, I doubt edgar could even win if he dropped to FW and fought Aldo.

So personally I don't like revolving door belts. It generally shows a weakish division, not a shark tank as people like to assume. But I think that era will soon end in LHW with Jones or eventually Davis.
Liddellianenko is offline  
post #10 of 10 (permalink) Old 03-07-2011, 02:44 PM
Lightweight
 
Kreed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,799
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by sNuFf_rEaLiTy View Post
I think revolving belts are just a sign of how close the competition is.

I love dominant champs to, Anderson Silva is no doubt an amazing MMA figurehead and I may not like GSP but I do respect him. I just personally don't think the WW and MW divisions are quite as deep and close as LW, LHW and HW. Not to take anything away from the defending champs, but is anyone surprised that it's those 2 divisions with dominant champs at the moment?
I agree with most of this but the part about the HW.That division isnt deep at all, for a guy with no striking/punch resistance and just raw brute strength (with no technique0 to just come in off the street and win the title like gangbusters that should tell you something.Who knows what cain goin to be like when he returns..The ufc HW division is a sorry case of who sucks the least..

To Live is 2 suffer, 2 survive? well that is 2 find meaning in the suffering
Kreed is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome