|
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books.
UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.
 |
|
03-08-2011, 03:11 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Degenerate Gambler
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,627
|
UFC 129: USA v Canada 2
As a US/Canada duel citizen I'm more excited about this card than any in recent memory. It features 9 US-Canada matchups!! That is the more than UFC 58, which was actually referred to as US vs Canada. The first time the US took it 5-3 (weird that they would use an even number), but this time Canada has the home field advantage!So what Country do you have winning this unofficial challenge? The matchups are (my picks in bold):
GSP v Shields
Mark Bocek v Ben Henderson
Rory MacDonald v Nate Diaz
Sean Pierson v Brian Foster
Yves Jabouin v Pablo Garza
Claude Patrick v Daniel Roberts
Ivan Menjivar v Charlie Valencia
Jason MacDonald v Ryan Jensen
John Makdessi v Kyle Watson
I guess I got it 5-4 US, but it's tight. The only locks I see are GSP over Shields and Rory over Nate Diaz. It kills me to pick against Makdessi, but Watson is probably lightyears ahead of him at grappling.
So who ya got?
__________________
Sig credit: MC
~ Lifetime Membership sponsored by RustyRenegade ~
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
03-08-2011, 03:29 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
You're Welcome.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Eh?
Posts: 6,286
|
Canada.
And I say this with no bias whatsoever.
__________________
Now this is riddum...
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 03:44 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
ROCKET FISTS
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,691
|
I love how the UFC does this and doesn't advertise. My favorite is US vs. Brazil but I think they only did it once or twice.
__________________
WAR CIGANO
sig credit to Limba
lobster train.
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 03:44 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Featherweight
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Psycho
USA.
And I say this with no bias whatsoever.
|
This.
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 04:12 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: See that guy over in the window, with the binoculars?
Posts: 19,698
|
Why on earth would you pick Ryan Jensen over J-Mac? J-Mac has some legit wins and hasn't lost to any real low level fighters his weakest loss being a freak injury against John Salter in a fight he appeared to be winning. Jensen has beaten absolutely nobody and has lost to any semi relevant fighter he has ever fought. Look for both those trends to continue.
__________________
"If you get hit and it hurts hit him back you not knocked out yet."-Joe Doerksen The Toxic Terrors (FFL) Georges St. Pierre*Sarra McMann*Pat Curran*Patricio Freire*Uriah Hall
NP FFL Team Toxic Challenge Fabricio Werdum*Gilbert Melendez*Rick Hawn*John Dodson*Urijah Faber
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 04:18 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
The Recipe
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Estonia
Posts: 13,226
|
Wow, i never thought about it like that. The USA-Canada thing.
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 04:29 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Degenerate Gambler
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,627
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxic
Why on earth would you pick Ryan Jensen over J-Mac? J-Mac has some legit wins and hasn't lost to any real low level fighters his weakest loss being a freak injury against John Salter in a fight he appeared to be winning. Jensen has beaten absolutely nobody and has lost to any semi relevant fighter he has ever fought. Look for both those trends to continue.
|
While I agree that Jensen has never beaten a relevant fighter, MacDonald hasn't beaten a relevant fighter since April '08. Jensen looked pretty solid during the first round against Court McGee, and J-Mac hasn't fought in a year. I expect the betting line to be slightly in MacDonald's favor, but Jensen to pull off a decision victory. I couldn't just pick all the favorites 
__________________
Sig credit: MC
~ Lifetime Membership sponsored by RustyRenegade ~
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 04:36 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
MMA Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 29
|
GSP v Shields
Mark Bocek v Ben Henderson
Rory MacDonald v Nate Diaz
Sean Pierson v Brian Foster
Yves Jabouin v Pablo Garza
Claude Patrick v Daniel Roberts
Ivan Menjivar v Charlie Valencia
Jason MacDonald v Ryan Jensen
John Makdessi v Kyle Watson
I hadn't even noticed this unlike the 117 card. Pretty cool, I guess I have it 5-4 for Canada and I would like to say I'm as impartial as it comes (in this regard, as I'm Dutch). In a way I love these unofficial nation v nation cards (like 117 and even 127 to some extent) but it kind of undermines the message that UFC could come with any card and the fans would buy it (as DW often says) when they stack a card with this many "hometown" fighters.
__________________
- Bas Rutten is my hero
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 07:23 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Welterweight
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Land of Truth
Posts: 2,142
|
I hate this US vs Canada or US Vs Uk , unless its actually a international tournament to represent your country to me it should be GSP Vs Shields and the origins dont mean shit.
I hate that USA USA USA or Aussie Aussie Aussie or Barmy Army etc just respect the fighter himself.
__________________
Bisping Fan extraordinaire
Velasquez will be back
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 08:34 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
All Eyez on Me
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 2,423
|
I dont know most of those fighters so I dont care which side wins. I will be rooting for Shields though.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|