Espn UFC Podcast: Dan Hardy suggests 9 judges for MMA scoring minefield - Page 2 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 11:26 AM
Cruz Control
LL's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ocean Front Property in Arizona.
Posts: 9,159
Originally Posted by aerius View Post
Or they could ban Cecil Peoples from judging and instantly reduce the number of bullshit decisions by at least 50%.
Cecil Peoples is one man, what about the other two guys there?

It's not like JUST Cecil's judging decides the fight, he has to at least have one person agree with him.

Anyway, Joe Rogan once said that the judges should have some insight/training on MMA, I agree with him on that. I also wouldn't oppose retired fighters judging fights they know the sport, they know the system.
LL is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #12 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 12:02 PM
Rauno's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Estonia
Posts: 17,676
9 is a tad extreme but i do think that 5 judges would make a little difference.

Rauno is offline  
post #13 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 12:17 PM
GlasgowKiss's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 704
Only problem with ex fighters is proving them to be impartial. Ex fighters will have connections to fighters, camps, friends all over the place, enemies, potential former opponents, former allies etc etc., that would go beyond being able to fully detect all the time. Favouritism or dislike, for a good reason, could be in the ex fighters mind, without anyone else ever knowing.

Of course, I'm not fully suggesting that ex fighters would all consciously do this, but there certainly would be potential conflicts of interest all over the place.
GlasgowKiss is offline  
post #14 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 12:17 PM
of Nazareth
Soojooko's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Moon
Posts: 10,148
Originally Posted by Rauno View Post
9 is a tad extreme but i do think that 5 judges would make a little difference.
It sounds extreme because its so far from what we have now. But far as I'm concerned, the more eyeballs on the action, the less chance of a stupid result. Assuming the eyeballs in question are reasonably educated of course... not some random collection of muppets.
Soojooko is offline  
post #15 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 12:55 PM
Super Ultra Great Delicious Wonderful
osmium's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 6,517
They would just have 9 people who don't know what they are looking at instead of 3. The number of judges isn't the problem the quality of judges is.
osmium is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome