Espn UFC Podcast: Dan Hardy suggests 9 judges for MMA scoring minefield - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-11-2011, 07:29 PM Thread Starter
Heavyweight
 
edlavis88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: A pom living in Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 3,850
                     
Espn UFC Podcast: Dan Hardy suggests 9 judges for MMA scoring minefield

Quote:
judging in MMA remains one of the most contentious areas within the sport. It remains open to debate. Every other week we hear ‘robbery’ when results are announced . Barely a week goes by without the subject being debated, and there are times when scoring and judging in MMA appears to be a dark, muddy mire.

Click here to listen to the podcast

Or click here to download the podcast on iTunes

The three-round contest last week between Diego Sanchez and Martin Kampmann at UFC: Live split writers, fans and judges. On this week’s ESPN UFC Podcast, hosted by your correspondent, we (I’m joined each week by Ben Blackmore deputy sport editor as ESPN.co.uk and Chris Park UK rep for MMA Torch) delved deep into MMA judging, speaking to respected referee Marc Goddard, and called on the view of UFC welterweight Dan Hardy.

Hardy thinks no less than nine judges should be used for MMA fights, and believes that as the sport progresses, ex-fighters should join the ranks of judges, and gain schooling at seminars. Hardy also revealed that he, too, would like to be involved as an official, judging fights when his career over. Hardy is in preparation for UFC Fight Night Seattle on March 26, and picked holes in the armoury of his opponent Anthony ‘Rumble’ Johnson.

Hardy believes that Johnson has cardio problems… and reveals the two men are friends, so this will not be a smack-talk-fulled few weeks.

Referee Goddard was enlightening on the Unified Rules of MMA, and argued that that we should all – fans, writers, observers and officials – revealing that when he gives seminars 9 out of 10 judges sometimes see fights differently. Marc is convinced that many MMA fans, new and old, do not understand the Unified Rules, and how to apply them. H e explains it is how ‘effective’ is applied and interpreted in four different areas. His findings in his clinics that so many different interpretations to fights can be found by judges is fascinating. The controversy over judging will never really go away, eithe, as far as I am concerned. Shocking, or the way it will always be ? Boxing has had contentious decisions for 150 years, so how will MMA, with multiple skills involved, ever refine its scoring ?

Or do we just love it as part of the sport, the human error, perception and subjectivity that leaves us all discussing the facets to exhaustion, in the office, down the pub, or over the dinner table ?

Elsewhere, Georges St-Pierre has been in London this week, training with Roger Gracie behind closed doors – jiu jitsu against Jake Shields ? Perhaps, but my sources tell me he has also been training sprawl and brawl, too, with several British fighters. Who said the UK was behind the rest of the world when the best come here to train (I know – Roger is Brazilian). Debate with me on the merits of a GSP superfight against Anderson Silva. My view is that it is a step too far.
Interesting Podcast.

edlavis88 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 12:26 AM
Bantamweight
 
Rastaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 769
                     
I think nine judges for each fight is excessive, but even bumping hte number up to five would for sure help stop these ridiculous decisions we have been seeing recently (so many more recently than in past years, I'm not sure why).

vBookie Record: 16-9

Current vBookie Bets:
Rastaman is offline  
post #3 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 05:33 AM
of Nazareth
 
Soojooko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Moon
Posts: 9,463
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rastaman View Post
I think nine judges for each fight is excessive, but even bumping hte number up to five would for sure help stop these ridiculous decisions we have been seeing recently (so many more recently than in past years, I'm not sure why).
Dan has a point. Having 3 rounds, each judged using the absurd 10 point must system, is ridiculous. If they refuse to open up the scoring then using more judges will have the same effect. They can be sat around the octagon covering all angles. Its a good idea if you ask me. Dunno why I never thought of it before.
Soojooko is online now  
post #4 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 07:40 AM
Bantamweight
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 989
                     
If the actualy standard of judging doesn't get better then it;'ll have little to no effect at all. I
anderton46 is offline  
post #5 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 07:44 AM
It's Hammer Time!
 
Hammerlock2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 9,589
                     
Usually a larger sample size means less chance of failure, so I guess more judges would help. Nine sounds a bit much though, maybe 5 would do.




Rookie Hammer Squad 2015
Frankie Edgar - Dominick Cruz - Jorge Masvidal - Cat Zingano - Holly Holm
Hammerlock2.0 is offline  
post #6 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 07:51 AM Thread Starter
Heavyweight
 
edlavis88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: A pom living in Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 3,850
                     
I prefered Dan's idea of juging panels being made up of ex fighters, or at least have specific judges JUST for MMA.

At the mo he is right that you might have 2 BJJ experts and a boxing judge on the panel and in reality they know less than most in the arena about MMA!

edlavis88 is offline  
post #7 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 08:33 AM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 28
                     
correct me if im wrong but the way i see it is
if a guy take you down and you get up FAIL.
if a guy takes u down and u sweep him FAIL.
if a guy take you down and stays in your guard rabbit punching you without damage FAIL.
the rest explains it self.
BJ vs Fitch good decision?
please be gentle on me its just my opion
gday is offline  
post #8 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 08:34 AM
Heavyweight
 
Voiceless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Neo-Babylon
Posts: 3,914
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by edlavis88 View Post
I prefered Dan's idea of juging panels being made up of ex fighters, or at least have specific judges JUST for MMA.

At the mo he is right that you might have 2 BJJ experts and a boxing judge on the panel and in reality they know less than most in the arena about MMA!
I was thinking that, too. It absolutely makes sense to have people judge the fights who know from personal experience how much impact a certain situation/move/technique has on the fight. Preferably it should be ex-fighters with a more or less balanced KO-Submission ratio on their record to diminish the bias.

I'm also with Hammerlock2.0 that 5 judges would be an acceptable compromise to get more reliable decisions. Maybe with the additional rule that a 3-2 scoring would be considered a draw.

And they definitely have to get rid of this 10point-must system they are using at the moment. They somehow must find a way to score rounds differently according to the dominance factor in the specific rounds.

Quote:
Or do we just love it as part of the sport, the human error, perception and subjectivity that leaves us all discussing the facets to exhaustion, in the office, down the pub, or over the dinner table ?
If that happens once in a while like in football it's ok for the fans to have something to discuss emotionally, but when it happens on every card it really gets just annoying and makes the sport uncredible.

Last edited by Voiceless; 03-12-2011 at 08:39 AM.
Voiceless is offline  
post #9 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 09:23 AM
Bantamweight
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 937
                     
His idea misses the crux of the whole problem. The problem is you have a pool of judges that is too small, and contains too many inexperienced candidates.

If you take 9 of those same people instead of 3, the only thing you will change is your budget. You'll just pay 3 times as much for crappy decisions.
Finnsidious is offline  
post #10 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 11:24 AM
Featherweight
 
aerius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,426
                     
Or they could ban Cecil Peoples from judging and instantly reduce the number of bullshit decisions by at least 50%.
aerius is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome