What will happen to Women's MMA now that the UFC owns SF - Page 2 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 57 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 10:16 PM
Lightweight
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,858
                     
It will be phased out after 2 years.
michelangelo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 57 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 10:28 PM
Don't Sweat the Technique
 
St.Paul Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,660
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWoods View Post
Good thing they won't. Strikeforce and the UFC will be separate entities. This won't be like the Pride deal because the office structure is already in place at Strikeforce. Also, Zuffa won't be dealing with the mafia in an attempt to even keep a foothold.

Strikeforce will be Strikeforce, the UFC will be the UFC. Changing of owners does not equal changing of all staff. I just foresee a lot of fighters released from the UFC going to Strikeforce and a lot of fighters in Strikeforce being promoted to the UFC. The UFC will be come the elite organization while Strikeforce will be like the development league.
Everybody keeps saying this. I just don't see that happening. Zuffa has worked very hard at growing the UFC brand; what would the point of having another organization with lesser fighters be? As soon as the Shotime deal is up SF will fold.

The up-and-comers will fight on the undercards. That will be the pseudo-developmental league.




Sig credit: MC

~ Lifetime Membership sponsored by RustyRenegade ~
St.Paul Guy is offline  
post #13 of 57 (permalink) Old 03-12-2011, 10:29 PM
Bantamweight
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 626
                     
Sadly, I have to agree with the gentlemen above. It won't live because it's neither good right now on a business standpoint or by the fans' standpoint.

I'd like to compare it to NBA vs WNBA. NBA simply has more guys at this top level than the WNBA does. It's why the WBNA has empty seats, and a only VERY poorly run NBA organization has empty seats on a consistent basis.

Also, I hate to admit this. Half the reason (at least half, I think) women's MMA got even a touch of fame is because Gina Carano was a good looking girl. Was she even the best? She was relatively good. However, she wasn't the best.

The audience is predominantly male in the ages of 18-40. Yeah, we appreciate good competition. The women's division isn't providing good fights consistently enough to warrant keeping them.
SpecC is offline  
post #14 of 57 (permalink) Old 03-13-2011, 08:53 AM Thread Starter
Welterweight
 
Sambo de Amigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Land of Truth
Posts: 2,311
                     
So its a unanimous belief that after SF contracts are up it will be pushed out. Pity really.

Bisping Fan extraordinaire

Velasquez will be back

Sambo de Amigo is offline  
post #15 of 57 (permalink) Old 03-13-2011, 09:43 AM
Kneel Before Christ!
 
Roflcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,024
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpecC View Post
Sadly, I have to agree with the gentlemen above. It won't live because it's neither good right now on a business standpoint or by the fans' standpoint.

I'd like to compare it to NBA vs WNBA. NBA simply has more guys at this top level than the WNBA does. It's why the WBNA has empty seats, and a only VERY poorly run NBA organization has empty seats on a consistent basis.

Also, I hate to admit this. Half the reason (at least half, I think) women's MMA got even a touch of fame is because Gina Carano was a good looking girl. Was she even the best? She was relatively good. However, she wasn't the best.

The audience is predominantly male in the ages of 18-40. Yeah, we appreciate good competition. The women's division isn't providing good fights consistently enough to warrant keeping them.
At some point, Strikeforce's women division was going to transpose into a WWE Diva's type of deal, where it is more of a 5 minute sideshow of the hottest bodybuilders and athletic girls they can find and have them roll around and whatnot.

Roflcopter is offline  
post #16 of 57 (permalink) Old 03-13-2011, 10:43 AM
Flyweight
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 327
                     
I think once the Showtime contract is up, the women are gonne. I find that unfortunate because the best of them are good fighters, and the best fights are very entertaining. But there just aren't enough good fighters. The Coenen-Carmouche was a good fight. So was Coenen-Kaufman.

If Cyborg was willing to drop down, you could have a decent 135 women's division. Cyborg, Coenen, Kaufman, Bazsler, Carmouche ....

But none of this is relevant, because Dana has long said he won;t promote women's fights, and unless somebody compelling comes along, he won't change his mind. Compelling meaning brings their own audience a la Lesnar.
HellRazor is offline  
post #17 of 57 (permalink) Old 03-13-2011, 11:07 AM
Amateur
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 194
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roflcopter View Post
No...


No they ****ing don't.

It's actually an embarrassment to the sport.

I might have to strangle Dana if he sells out.

That Coenen vs that gorilla dyke was probably one of the worst displays of fighting I've ever seen. The punches from full mount were the absolute epitome of little girly punches.


I'd tolerate a junior division with kids before I tolerate women.
I personally enjoy watching cyborg beat some other women's ass for 3 rounds. But that's just me.
malice is offline  
post #18 of 57 (permalink) Old 03-13-2011, 01:35 PM
The Internet Prophet
 
deadmanshand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,750
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roflcopter View Post
No...


No they ****ing don't.

It's actually an embarrassment to the sport.

I might have to strangle Dana if he sells out.

That Coenen vs that gorilla dyke was probably one of the worst displays of fighting I've ever seen. The punches from full mount were the absolute epitome of little girly punches.


I'd tolerate a junior division with kids before I tolerate women.
Wow... Coenen/Carmouche was probably the second best fight on the card. Carnouche's gnp needs improvement but Coenen did ride out three rounds of it to pull off a slick triangle. It was a good fight and it wasn't the first women's mma fight I have found entertaining.

Women's mma is behind the guys mma because they haven't had a venue for it. You give them the same chance and you will start to get real skilled and athletic fighters in there. And they deserve that chance.

And, by the by, Carmouche's GNP was at least attempting to inflict harm and wasn't say Chael's "Please God Don't Stand Me Up" chops to Anderson.

That is not dead which can eternal lie and withs strange aeons even death may die.
deadmanshand is offline  
post #19 of 57 (permalink) Old 03-13-2011, 01:39 PM
Super Ultra Great Delicious Wonderful
 
osmium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 6,517
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roflcopter View Post
No...


No they ****ing don't.

It's actually an embarrassment to the sport.

I might have to strangle Dana if he sells out.

That Coenen vs that gorilla dyke was probably one of the worst displays of fighting I've ever seen. The punches from full mount were the absolute epitome of little girly punches.


I'd tolerate a junior division with kids before I tolerate women.
Yeah it was like I was watching Jake Shields from mount so girly.

Strikeforce, Bellator, and smaller orgs will continue to have womens fights.
osmium is offline  
post #20 of 57 (permalink) Old 03-13-2011, 01:46 PM
Colossal-weight
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,015
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roflcopter View Post
No...


No they ****ing don't.

It's actually an embarrassment to the sport.

I might have to strangle Dana if he sells out.

That Coenen vs that gorilla dyke was probably one of the worst displays of fighting I've ever seen. The punches from full mount were the absolute epitome of little girly punches.

I'd tolerate a junior division with kids before I tolerate women.
I agree, but I think you are a little overboard. They aren't an "embarrassment to the sport".

But if it took the UFC that long to have 145 and 135 divisions because the divisions have been too thin...then why on earth would they install a womens division?

Personally, I don't find the fights that entertaining. And the divisions are too thin to be credible.

They will stay on SF...and if a merge happens I think and I hope they will get rid of them.
jonnyg4508 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome