He's not a beat writer, and it's not journalism. It was a simple editorial aka blog, aka opinion piece.
Edit: Calling Jones a ho is definitely unprofessional, but there's nothing wrong with writing a biased editorial.
But, writing biased articles and on top of that calling the subject of your article a *HO* - pretty much disqualifies your article/writing (whateva' that is) and throws ZERO credibility on you/your work.
I know it's all about opinions - especially on the Internet (blogs, forums etc) - but some of them are so stupid it makes you switch to *mad mode* if you know what i mean.
Example of a retard opinion: quote from the *retard's* article --->
Props to both men for this fight
- talking about Evans and Davis accepting to fight.
So...he gives props to Evans for accepting a fight after 15 months of absence, when Evans was the one who refused any fight for 10 months, just to be sure he will have a guaranteed title shot once Shogun returns?!?!?!
Sorry, this is beyond my power of understanding and processing things.
In the case of Phil Davis - agreed 100%. The kid has been one of the most active fighters in the last 18 months: 5 fights. One on short notice (Nogueira) and this one almost the same situation.
But, Davis is an intelligent person who knows this is a big chance for him and he has to take it.