|
Ultimate Fighter TV The Ultimate Fighter is the UFC's reality TV show featuring aspiring MMA fighters aspiring to win a contract with the UFC.
 |
|
06-20-2008, 01:01 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cambridge, ON
Posts: 8,796
|
If anyone was screwed, it was Tim Credeur.
Why the hell did he have to fight C.B.? He didn't. He should have gone through in Jesse's place, not fight the loser of the other semi-final match-up to secure a spot in the finale. People can complain about Jesse getting the shaft, but the real screw-over came in the form of Tim Credeur being wrongfully denied his spot in the finals.
Now we have a rematch in the finale, a completely undeserved one as far as I'm concerned. Where's the justice?
What do you guys think?
Last edited by Fedor>all : 06-20-2008 at 01:07 PM.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
06-20-2008, 01:05 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Amatuer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 102
|
Completely agree with your Fedor.
__________________
Respectfully,
~Mobley101~
Favorite Fighters
1. Georges St. Pierre
2. Andrei Arlovski
3. Jon Fitch
4. Brock Lesnar
5. Forrest Griffin
Officially on the Amir Sodollah Bandwagon. The kids entertaining as hell.
Forum Bets: 22-2
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 01:09 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Back In Black
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 4,177
|
I agree completely with you, but I'll let you know ahead of time that you're going to get FLAMED for saying this. It happened to me already.
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 01:09 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
International Stalker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 5,203
|
I didn't even consider this, but that does sound shitty now.
__________________

Credit to ThaMuffinMan
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 01:10 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Backseat of the PlazzVan
Posts: 6,472
|
That's what I thought but Dana wanted CB in the finals, so he got CB in the finals.
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 01:12 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cambridge, ON
Posts: 8,796
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisl972
I agree completely with you, but I'll let you know ahead of time that you're going to get FLAMED for saying this. It happened to me already.
|
 I really don't care if I get flamed, the truth hurts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMW
I didn't even consider this, but that does sound shitty now.
|
It sounds shitty because it IS. How can you have two finalists from the same bracket? You can't. Amir already beat C.B., and Tim Credeur rightfully should have been a shoe-in due to Jesse's blow-up.
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 01:59 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Bantamweight
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Framingham Ma
Posts: 921
|
thats exactly what i thought watching the show amir already beat cb once why should he have to beat him again
__________________
Team Link Member
NPFFL: Evan Dunham, Daniel Cormier, Jim Miller, Cole Konrad
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 02:36 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
MMA Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 51
|
I thought I was the only one that felt this way. Amir vs Tim in the finale would be alot more appealing then Amir vs CB II.
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 03:01 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
You're Welcome.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Eh?
Posts: 6,451
|
I understand what you're getting at, but I think it came down to a case of 'let's have the two losing semi-finalists duke it out for a spot in the finals' moreso than anything else. The fact is, Tim lost. So, do you simply hand him a spot in the finale despite that loss, or do you give him a chance to redeem himself, and thus earn his spot? I'm not saying he had to fight CB, and chances are, you're right about Dana wanting CB in the finale, but to just give Tim that spot would have been a tad empty, would it not? Just tossing it out there. Feel free to respond.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|