You should try actually WATCHING the fight instead of just looking at his Wikipedia page and acting as though you know what you're talking about. That fight was completely one sided and Brookins did nothing besides 1 takedown.
If you want to say he's going to win because he has better takedowns or better submissions etc then fine but simply stepping into the same cage as Jose Aldo doesn't make you the better fighter.
what are you looking for a fight or something?
you asked why ppl might think he could win
and i told you.
you didnt even ask what i thought and i havent even told you so dont assume you know the first friggin thing about me.
if you actually read your own posts you would realise that.
i simply answered your question.
ive heard a lot of ppl cite that fight as part of the rationale for backing him so i told you.
also, acting like taking jose aldo into round 3 isnt impressive is ridiculous. name the best guy any of those other guys have even faced.
all we hear is how your man is the bjj trainer of matt hughes. but his mma record is won 12 lost 6 and the best people hes ever faced are Spencer Fisher and Bart Palaszewski who ko'd him in 25 seconds and 30 seconds respectively, although i doubt youd actually know who they are. his last two fights he lost in round 1 to no name fighters and he has been ko'd 3 times and decisioned 3 times.
brookins is 11-3 and has never been subbed. hes only ever been stopped once and that was by jose friggin aldo. im not saying he cant lose but hes beaten Luis Palomino, Jose Figueroa and Yves Jabouin. hes ko'd 2 people, subbed 8 and decisioned 1.
that hardly makes him the underdog does it?!
take it or leave it, but if you are gonna ask for help and then give it, then take it somewhere else son.