Ignore Rival, people. He's quite possibly the biggest SF fanboy, and most anti-UFC individual at this site. So much so that it borders on the ridiculous, and he gets offended any time someone dare to hold a UFC fighter in higher regard than a SF fighter. Give me a break... I love Dan Henderson, but the Dan we saw last night would have easily fallen to a 200 pound GSP. Only difference is, GSP would have taken him down that much easier than Shields. I also happen to be one of the few remaining Shields fans it would seem, but even I'm not biased enough to claim that Shields could outwrestle GSP. Frankly, I'm not going to make that claim about either man... I fully admit after last night's performance, GSP vs. Jake Shields is a fight I legitimately want to see. Your coming in here and claiming 'Shield's TDs > GSP's TDD' with no basis of proof or any form of reasoning whatsoever is completely asinine. Administrator or not, I'm calling you on your BS, as it's becoming ever more clear that this whole 'anti-Dana' and 'ant-UFC' attitude you have overtakes anything and everything you might actually have to say.
What leads you to believe that GSP wouldn't just stuff Jake? He did so with ease against a very good wrestler in Kos, and in the few times he's actually wound up on his back, he's been back on his feet within a millisecond. I don't want to turn this into a UFC vs. SF thread. But you can't just come in here and expect 'Shield's TDs > GSP's TDD' to cut it, especially when GSP has shown world class TDD, whereas Shield's has shown his takedowns are no where near the level of GSP's. And while I tip my hat to Shields for taking on 'world class' middleweights, as I said eariler, a 200 pound GSP would have beaten the Dan Henderson who showed up last night. He already beat Mayhem Miller. And he'd beat Robbie Lawler, whose about as big and as skilled as Dan Hardy off of his back. You're reaching, on so many levels, and even you must know this.