Mixed Martial Arts Forum banner

Stephan Bonnar .vs. Ken Shamrock, who would win?

  • Stephan Bonnar

    Votes: 5 29.4%
  • The worlds weakest man Ken Shamrock

    Votes: 12 70.6%
1 - 19 of 19 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,177 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
My money is on Stephan Bonnar, he would win against Shamrock either 2nd round 5:00 Doctor Stoppage or TKO Strikes. Anyone else agree? Once Shamrock gets on the ground on his back the fight ends.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,177 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
No, Ken Shamrock can't beat Bonnar IMO. Ken Shamrock would lose to Evans badly and get knocked out by Griffin. Bonnar at least stayed in the fight against Griffin. Bonnar can beat Shamrock along with any other light heavyweight in the UFC if they can take Shamrock to the ground.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
215 Posts
If you are saying that Shamrock's ground game is weak based on his matches with Tito then you must need a little sleep. Tito's game IS the ground, he's beaten the best in the business by doing his ground game, because he is the best in the world at it. But if you're saying that Bonnar could take Shamrock on the ground and beat him, then you need a little wake up call. Shamrock's game lately has been his stand-up, and he'll put on a slug fest with Bonnar or Griffin and I don't see much of an advantage for Bonnar or Griffin. It's a nice little dream of yours, but I don't see it happen in the real world.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,177 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Why do Shamrock fans like you always have to come back by saying "Ken Shamrocks ground doesn't suck just because of Tito". Ken Shamrock lost to Rich Franklin, Kazushi Sakuraba as soon as he fell to the ground as well in his most recent fights besides Tito 2.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
213 Posts
bonner beat SHAMROCK haha ha ha ha ha ha ha HA HA HA HA UH IT HURTS LOOK why is it that you think shamrock would lose to bonner the problem with shamrock is that he allways fights elite fighters sutch as franklin, otiz ect now say if shamrock would comeback and fight his way up he would do well. take tanner for egsample he destroys all his oponents but when he comes to fighting a champion he loses tanner lost to franklin twice and got humiliated when fought tito is he a crap fighter no he is one of the best just not at the elite level now take SHAMROCK just cos he lost to tito doesnt meen bonner would beat him you fool if they was to FIGHT IT WOULD BE NO DIFFERENT THAN NATE VS FRANKLIN OR LEBEN VS SILVIA

GET REAL!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,788 Posts
Bonnar would KO/TKO old Shammy, These fighters from UFC 1 dont stand a chance against the level of competition of todays fighters, they are just tooo one dimensional , and it sucks seeing them get there asses kicked all the time but hey , the old sayings true , "out with the old and in with the new" , Lennox Lewis said it perfect , "You cant teach an old dog new tricks" which has been proven time and time again
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
669 Posts
Bonnar sucks are you guys kidding me?

WHO HAS HE BEAT? LOL

I mean Rashard Evans destroyed him.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,788 Posts
Spit206Fire said:
Bonnar sucks are you guys kidding me?

WHO HAS HE BEAT? LOL

I mean Rashard Evans destroyed him.

wow no big deal in losing to Rashad Evans, hes a damn good fighter , you must be a fool for thinkin Shammy can beat em ... Rashad would manhandle the old man

since you like to judge fights like that , Bonnar gave Forrest a helluva fight ( i personally think he won it ) but oh well he lost , and Forrest gave Tito a good go .... so doesnt that tell you 1 Rashad is a damn good fighter for absolutely manhandling Bonnar a man that went to war with Forrest in such a close fight, and 2 how long did Shammy last with Ortiz ? exactly. Forrest hung in there with Tito showing that Bonnar/Griffin/Evans/the new era are way too much for Ken Shamrock , thats for damn sure
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
669 Posts
that was also almost 2 years ago lol

Forrest has progressed his game and won fights in other ways then decision. Bonnar on the other hand has only fought other TUF fighters. I dislike bonnar a whole lot personally, im sick of hearing him say how he gave TUF a good start and he always says in his high little lame voice "ya i'd like to give myself a pat on the back". Shamrock would CRUSH bonnar, he may be old but i know Shamrock can take a better beating then bonnar can. I'm not a big shamrock fan, i just hate bonnar and think he's the most overrated fighter.
Just like this PPV should be Rashard Evans Vs Forrest Griffen, not bonnar who LOST!
 

·
canadian champ
Joined
·
1,522 Posts
I hate forrest and bonnar. Shamrock is getting old. The old shamrock the one who beat bas, kimo, almost beat gracie. He would kill bonnar. I'm still taking shammy. Tito just has his number. The franklin fight although i belive ace would beat him again, was a slip and a loss but not a bad loss.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
759 Posts
moldy said:
I hate forrest and bonnar. Shamrock is getting old. The old shamrock the one who beat bas, kimo, almost beat gracie. He would kill bonnar. I'm still taking shammy. Tito just has his number. The franklin fight although i belive ace would beat him again, was a slip and a loss but not a bad loss.
yeah who knows what would have happened in the ken/ace fight if ken hadnt slipped. lol kind of a fluke if u ask me but thats just what I think.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,788 Posts
Ken felll twice ( on his own ) in that fight , no fluke , simply old age . :dunno:

I cannot believe ppl actually think Ken can beat Bonnar , Ken cant beat any top 20-25-30 205lber today, its been proven ppl open your eyes , Shiiiit and lets talk about him in his prime , he couldnt even beat a Natural WELTERWEIGHT , when he was a HVW at the time , thats bad , thats like Hughes subbing Arlovski/Monson/Vera/etc just isnt gunna happen
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
759 Posts
Punishment 101 said:
Ken felll twice ( on his own ) in that fight , no fluke , simply old age . :dunno:

I cannot believe ppl actually think Ken can beat Bonnar , Ken cant beat any top 20-25-30 205lber today, its been proven ppl open your eyes , Shiiiit and lets talk about him in his prime , he couldnt even beat a Natural WELTERWEIGHT , when he was a HVW at the time , thats bad , thats like Hughes subbing Arlovski/Monson/Vera/etc just isnt gunna happen
well when fought royce the first time, he didnt know how to defend bjj then the 2nd time they fought he really messed royce up. too bad there wasnt any judges at the time or that 2nd fight would have been kens.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,788 Posts
moldy said:
where do you rank Kimo then. Ken cleaned kimo not that long ago.

Kimo doesnt make top 50 thats forsure , besides hes a HVW , were talking about 205lbers...

But... Kimo/Coleman/Bas these are some of the guys Shamrock has to start fighting before he retires , b/c he doesnt stand a chance against the new breed of fighters. I actually like Ken , and i would rather not see him leaving the sport with a whole bunch of losses and diminishing his career/legacy with each fight , fight Coleman , beat his ass and retire , thats the best thing for him to do
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
27 Posts
As bad as Shamrock is, I would pick him to beat Stephan.

The bottom line is that Stephan Bonnar sucks. I don't usually berate fighters, but this guy is not a professional mma fighter. He is slow, awkward, and weak.
 
1 - 19 of 19 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top