Mixed Martial Arts Forum banner

What is your opinion on rematch clauses?

  • Support

    Votes: 4 40.0%
  • Opposed

    Votes: 6 60.0%
1 - 4 of 4 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
164 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Are you for or against rematch clauses?

They could make for some intersting fights but at the same time they keep other talent away from the titles.

I think that a champion who is beat has to EARN their rematch. I think that they should have an immediate condenders match rather than an immediate title shot.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
21,821 Posts
Never heard of a rematch clause that is a WWE gimick. It would make no sense when was the last time the LHW title was defended? We would have been robbed of countless fights.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
329 Posts
In some cases, they're completely reasonable. Suppose Anderson Silva loses to the winner of 'he Ultimate Fighter'? Is there a fighter more deserving of a title shot than Silva at middleweight?

Obviously it shouldn't be automatic, but it isn't now.
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Top